From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01.wxs.nl [195.121.6.56]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j49KR1e6026758 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 20:27:01 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip51cfc8c3.direct-adsl.nl [81.207.200.195]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j49KRAXO008094 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 22:27:10 +0200 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9110210027 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 22:27:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:27:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050505001415.39e44e97@snowdrop> <200505050328.06938.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <200505050328.06938.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2389154.RRKLiTm2ei"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505092227.10236.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1081d8bb-95e8-4cf6-a2d0-c6d506756703 X-Archives-Hash: 6f323909675a6e17f6b3ee226be53948 --nextPart2389154.RRKLiTm2ei Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:28, Michiel de Bruijne wrote: > On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > For us to support LSB: > > > > * We'd have to use RPM instead of portage > > That's not correct, quote from LSB: > "The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own > packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for installing > the LSB-conformant packages." > > So basically we can continue to do rpm2targz like we do now and still be > LSB-compliant. Only if it's wrapped up automatically. At the minimum it would require a=20 mapping from lsb dependencies to gentoo dependencies. But yes, we wouldn't= =20 need to throw portage out. It just needs rpm file support. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2389154.RRKLiTm2ei Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCf8eebKx5DBjWFdsRAvD7AKCN6jSm7ZLffboSjz4yVMECHLcodQCg6CnL 00bs4TeoRkxJMaSf5lVS+T8= =936x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2389154.RRKLiTm2ei-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list