public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 16:51:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050507165136.203eb877@snowdrop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496a69ca1beb83ff3b5ee29ed055ba7c@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2248 bytes --]

On Sat, 7 May 2005 10:31:49 -0500 Kito <kito@gentoo.org> wrote:
| > Isn't going to work. A lot of these changes need package-specific
| > knowledge that most people just don't have.
| 
| If a dev doesn't have adequate knowledge for a particular package he 
| shouldn't be fscking with it in the first place. So there said package
| can sit, having only the ability to install to / just like it always 
| has until someone with interest/need/knowledge comes along and takes 
| care of it.

You and I know that. Brian seems to be assuming that the people that do
the work will know how to handle every single package in the tree.

| All the points you are making sound like the result of too much crisis
| management, progress shouldn't be impeded by fear of work or change.

Eh? No. It's about getting a major change done cleanly and without
causing another disaster of OSX-sized proportions.

| > No, they're a demonstration of why the GLEP in its current form is
| > inadequate. I'll carry on pulling up further examples until you
| > realise that it's not just a minor issue, it's a huge problem that
| > needs a big change to the GLEP.
| 
| How about suggesting what that big change would be?

I've done that already several times in this thread.

| > The reason that this thing was written up as a GLEP was because the
| > author was trying to bypass the discussion and get around having to
| > fix various flaws that had been pointed out previously.
| >
| > | Could you break it down to "if I'm going into home, I need xyz at
| > | the home level rather then global/usr" ?
| >
| > Hrm. Being able to say "I need xyz installed globally, and abc 
| > installed
| > either globally or at home level" would work if and only if there
| > was a way of finding out where abc and xyz had been installed.
| 
| Hmmm, what about a possible extension to the world file or a create a 
| new file to store metadata such as the package installation prefix.

Needs to be easily accessible from the ebuild. Parsing things in bash is
a nuisance.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-07 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-02 12:22 [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-02 14:13 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-03  0:02   ` Brian Harring
2005-05-03 12:53     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-03 14:12     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-05  8:48       ` Brian Harring
2005-05-05  8:55         ` Brian Harring
2005-05-05 14:01         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-06  5:09           ` Brian Harring
2005-05-06 13:12             ` Brian Jackson
2005-05-07  1:07               ` Brian Harring
2005-05-06 13:28             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-07  1:05               ` Brian Harring
2005-05-07  1:39                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-07  7:08                   ` Brian Harring
2005-05-07 14:49                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-07 15:31                       ` Kito
2005-05-07 15:51                         ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2005-05-08  7:58                           ` [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager OT Brian Harring
2005-05-08 15:22                             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-07 15:47                       ` [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager Jason Stubbs
2005-05-07 20:02                         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-08  8:33                         ` Brian Harring
2005-05-09  0:46                           ` [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager, [gentoo-dev] Marius Mauch
2005-05-09 10:54                             ` [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager Brian Harring
2005-05-19  8:18                         ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-19  8:30                           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-19 11:05                             ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-19 11:19                               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-19 12:46                                 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-19 19:42                                   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-19 13:01                           ` Jason Stubbs
2005-05-20 12:30                             ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-21  1:22                               ` Jason Stubbs
2005-05-23  7:11                                 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-07  9:58                   ` Marius Mauch
2005-05-12  7:56                     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-12 23:44                       ` Marius Mauch
2005-05-03 12:54   ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-02 19:15 ` Brian Jackson
2005-05-03  0:58   ` Alec Warner
2005-05-03  2:11     ` Brian Jackson
2005-05-03  2:48       ` Brian Harring
2005-05-03  3:16         ` Brian Jackson
2005-05-03  6:05         ` Marius Mauch
2005-05-03 12:54         ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-03 12:54     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-03 13:22 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-05-07 11:18   ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-24  9:53 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2005-05-24 10:07   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-24 10:43     ` Brian Harring
2005-05-24 12:21     ` Michael Haubenwallner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050507165136.203eb877@snowdrop \
    --to=ciaranm@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox