public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michiel de Bruijne <m.debruijne@hccnet.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 18:17:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505041817.53353.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF92174C11.03A4919D-ONC1256FF7.002EBF08-42256FF7.00314550@inside.allianz.de>

On Wednesday 04 May 2005 11:03, daniel.kerwin@allianz.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i just returned from a meeting with IBM which was about getting
> support for Gentoo Linux (hardware and software). The people from IBM
> told me that it's possible for Gentoo to become officially supported
> on IBM server hardware (xSeries, pSeries and zSeries).
>
> They told me about their hardware offerings to the Debian Project so
> that they could certify their distribution. I think this is a great
> chance for gentoo to become more common for productive use.
>
> Is there a general interrest in doing this and how can this start?

Interest; yes, believe that it will happen in the (forseeable) future; 
absolutely not.

The biggest showstopper is that needs to be fixed first is lack of 
predictability:
- Gentoo is extremely customizable (USE-flags, compiler settings, etc.). To 
achieve predictability all those customizable options need to be locked.
- moving Portage-tree; if I install a system today, it wont be the same as a 
system I installed one month ago.
- no standard method of installation; supported OS's are basically clicking 
next, next, finish. Installation is done, system is identical. With Gentoo 
you get a lot of choices for a single component (e.g. vanilla-sources vs. 
gentoo-sources, vixie-cron vs. dcron, etc.). A default needs to be defined.

Second showstopper is lack of (LSB-)certification;
Like it or not, the typical managers in this world say if product x isn't 
y-certified we wont use/support it. Gentoo needs a profile for a 
LSB-compliant system.

There are more items that needs to be resolved before it's even possible to 
talk about official support. Good news is that with the current 
"Gentoo-framework" it's possible to fix both problems for example by creating 
a profile, lock everything in this profile and make sure old ebuilds are not 
removed during a sync. Other options are also possible (e.g. creating a 
separate tree). See GLEP 19 for more details. The only problem is lack of 
interest/time/priority from the developers/community.

If you want support from a company as big as IBM, you need to start smaller 
(e.g. NX, MySQL, Open-Xchange). If these companies are willing to support 
their products on Gentoo, then maybe bigger companies will follow.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-04  9:03 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04  9:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-05-04  9:17   ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 10:21     ` José Alberto Suárez López
2005-05-04 10:37     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Antwort: " Duncan
2005-05-04 10:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Cummings
2005-05-04 10:32   ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-05-04 10:36   ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 13:32     ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2005-05-04 13:50       ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 14:08         ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2005-05-04 14:24           ` Michael Cummings
2005-05-04 14:18         ` Brett Curtis
2005-05-04 14:39           ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 15:36             ` Brett Curtis
2005-05-04 14:12       ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 14:28         ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2005-05-04 14:35         ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 13:47     ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-05-04 14:09       ` Mike Frysinger
2005-05-04 16:17 ` Michiel de Bruijne [this message]
2005-05-04 16:26   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-04 16:46     ` Lance Albertson
2005-05-04 16:55       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-04 20:28         ` Ryan
2005-05-04 22:31     ` David Krider
2005-05-04 23:14       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-05  1:28         ` Michiel de Bruijne
2005-05-05 14:11           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-09 20:27           ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-05-05  1:33       ` Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505041817.53353.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl \
    --to=m.debruijne@hccnet.nl \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox