From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j43Ci4uN003353 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:44:05 GMT Received: from p061198129208.ppp.prin.ne.jp ([61.198.129.208] helo=linux.box) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DSwky-0007ll-Il for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 12:44:10 +0000 Received: by linux.box (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A0BB47245; Tue, 3 May 2005 21:43:58 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 21:43:54 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4274ACD1.9020003@gentoo.org> <42773C05.3020706@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42773C05.3020706@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4230562.kseUx3VXh6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505032143.57776.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9d69688f-2dae-4c93-bdd2-54ee7733b855 X-Archives-Hash: 177936a21903196d4caf4f01f93ee609 --nextPart4230562.kseUx3VXh6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 03 May 2005 17:53, Aaron Walker wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around? They > > make profile changes a mess for anyone who wants to do something crazy > > like change default USE flags for everyone. (Who would ever need to do > > that?!?!) > > The new profiles.desc format should solve this problem (what's valid and > not) whenever it's added. What's the ETA on this anyways? Doesn't the > latest repoman support it? There is no change in format. There was only the question of whether multip= le=20 profiles per architecture is supported. From 2.0.51.20 onward, it is. Regards, Jason Stubbs --nextPart4230562.kseUx3VXh6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCd3INxvWNPsk/ZP4RAvlYAKC6o/pD7FdsSm3Sp7qzJElyqHgIOACeM/eL mUQqMPyNhk2i+26Zh6VQp/g= =GFqL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4230562.kseUx3VXh6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list