From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j43Im4L1023973 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 18:48:04 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DT2RI-0005rK-4l for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 18:48:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 10613 invoked from network); 3 May 2005 14:42:12 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 3 May 2005 14:42:12 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:49:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4274ACD1.9020003@gentoo.org> <1115136614.889.281.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1115136614.889.281.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505031449.54237.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: d10156b3-7393-4373-8d2e-d9e7430b98d0 X-Archives-Hash: 1d5eb60b2fb22cf5934ab3ceceb9e825 On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:10 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles. afaik the only thing it'd need is a 'make.defaults' and a custom 'packages' (where we'd force a newer version of portage of course) i dont think we even need a set, we could just do it with one ... after all, we can stick bash code into make.defaults and have it do something ugly like run `uname` or parse make.defaults to figure out the correct ARCH -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list