From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 02:54:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505010254.37352.jstubbs@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505010245.06898.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]
On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:45, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:32, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:30:05PM +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> > > a day or two ago mentioned that i'm using per-package FEATURES in
> > > '/etc/portage/package.features-file' ("-collision-protect") so was
> > > thinking about doing the same for "test" (for half a day "test" is ON
> > > in my 'make.conf'). Think of putting it OFF for failing packages while
> > > still keeping it ON globally. Also will like the get some opinions.
> >
> > It would be a shame if every user would have to find out for himself
> > which packages need "-test". Additionally, when the tests are fixed,
> > the package will still not be using them. It would be nice if something
> > like package.features could become not only part of portage, but also
> > of the profiles.
>
> package.features is not part of portage, nor will it be for some time to
> come due to the issues outlined in my other response. RESTRICT="test" is
> viable though.
More than viable, it's already implemented...
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-30 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-30 13:48 [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 15:30 ` Rumen Yotov
2005-04-30 15:48 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-04-30 16:32 ` Rumen Yotov
2005-04-30 17:32 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 17:45 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-04-30 17:54 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2005-04-30 19:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-05-01 1:27 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-01 7:27 ` R Hill
2005-05-01 8:59 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505010254.37352.jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--to=jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox