From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tiger.gg3.net (142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp [219.111.13.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3UCcLcP011537 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:38:22 GMT Received: (qmail 22871 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2005 21:38:26 +0900 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 21:38:26 +0900 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:38:26 +0900 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:38:26 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft Message-ID: <20050430123826.GA101054@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200504281840.23788.lanius@gentoo.org> <20050430131232.21b24928@sven.genone.homeip.net> <200504301407.20723.jaervosz@gentoo.org> <200504301327.50857@zippy.emcb.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504301327.50857@zippy.emcb.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 9996446e-8863-4fd4-bbeb-d3ff75f13cff X-Archives-Hash: 9fc795883e1aac54c87e1b1155a67dac --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable maillog: 30/04/2005-13:27:44(+0100): Elfyn McBratney types > On Saturday 30 Apr 2005 13:07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > > On Saturday 30 April 2005 13:12, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200 > > > > > > Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > > > > On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > > > > Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :) > > > > > > > > > > Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any provid= ed > > > > > virtuals. > > > > > > > > Why not let Portage print that before scanning? > > > > > > Print what? > > > The scanning is done on the general config parsing, and you can't rea= lly > > > do anything before that. > > > > Scanning configuration/installed packages or something. It just seems a= bit > > more userfriendly to print something if it takes a long while to do > > anything. > > > > Just my to 0.02=E2=82=AC >=20 > Sounds good to me, if possible. Could we maybe be more noisy here when p= eople=20 > run with --verbose ? You know, so your not left staring at nothingness w= hile=20 > portage does it's imports, scans, whatever .. Also consider that Control-C doesn't really do anything at that stage. --=20 / Georgi Georgiev / "Why can't we ever attempt to solve a / \ chutz@gg3.net \ problem in this country without having a \ / +81(90)2877-8845 / 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, / \ ------------------- \ talk.politics.misc \ --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCc3xCfXO2NUT1EmYRAsSWAJ9ojfWR/TJ8Z4fz/AV/++BPjXLp9gCcClgW xkZ6rs/mDN49SXnVquMGU6I= =7bpe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list