* [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs
@ 2005-04-29 22:11 Stephen Bennett
2005-04-29 22:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Bennett @ 2005-04-29 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi all,
Since USE_EXPAND has moved into the profiles, and we find ourselves
needing to switch code and dependencies based on the libc in use (mainly
due to glibc being weird and bundling several other libraries together),
I'd like to add a LIBC variable to the profiles, and add it into
USE_EXPAND. That way, ebuilds that need to can handle code specific to
one libc in a vaguely sane manner.
Any objections? Comments?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs
2005-04-29 22:11 [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs Stephen Bennett
@ 2005-04-29 22:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-29 22:28 ` Stephen Bennett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2005-04-29 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:11:33 +0100 Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| Since USE_EXPAND has moved into the profiles, and we find ourselves
| needing to switch code and dependencies based on the libc in use
| (mainly due to glibc being weird and bundling several other libraries
| together), I'd like to add a LIBC variable to the profiles, and add it
| into USE_EXPAND. That way, ebuilds that need to can handle code
| specific to one libc in a vaguely sane manner.
Any reason you don't just do all four (five?) at once?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs
2005-04-29 22:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2005-04-29 22:28 ` Stephen Bennett
2005-05-01 1:56 ` Stephen Bennett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Bennett @ 2005-04-29 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 23:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Any reason you don't just do all four (five?) at once?
None really ... make the list LIBC, KERNEL, and USERLAND then, all in
USE_EXPAND. USERLAND will need to be thought about, due to the way
Portage currently uses it internally.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs
2005-04-29 22:28 ` Stephen Bennett
@ 2005-05-01 1:56 ` Stephen Bennett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Bennett @ 2005-05-01 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 23:28 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 23:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Any reason you don't just do all four (five?) at once?
>
> None really ... make the list LIBC, KERNEL, and USERLAND then, all in
> USE_EXPAND. USERLAND will need to be thought about, due to the way
> Portage currently uses it internally.
OK, I haven't heard any objections, so these are going in.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-01 1:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-29 22:11 [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and libcs Stephen Bennett
2005-04-29 22:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-29 22:28 ` Stephen Bennett
2005-05-01 1:56 ` Stephen Bennett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox