From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3S1Pvup007643 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:25:57 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQxmw-0006fV-Qc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:25:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 31038 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2005 21:21:45 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2005 21:21:45 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How well supported is collision-protect? Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:27:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050428002920.GA9023@lion.gg3.net> <200504272037.10393.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050428011454.GA23848@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20050428011454.GA23848@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504272127.12126.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 41d1dee5-dd5a-4c69-bd1d-0d6616ee547c X-Archives-Hash: 56188d0a7e80d53ed36a44da57f6119c On Wednesday 27 April 2005 09:14 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > Uh, I did not expect such a response. I personally have a whole bunch of > collisions on my system, most of which man pages. > > http://gg3.net/~chutz/gentoo/collisions > > I'll see to report them. make sure they arent already fixed ... just glancing at the top list, a bunch are either already in bugzilla or resolved also, there's the issue of SLOT based packages ... dont report those just yet ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list