From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3MEGGrJ005721 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:16:17 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOywm-0005Cc-A9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:15:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 12071 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2005 10:13:53 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2005 10:13:53 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replace 'sash' with 'busybox' as our static rescue shell Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:17:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504220938.47437.vapier@gentoo.org> <1114178582.3552.7.camel@Darkmere> In-Reply-To: <1114178582.3552.7.camel@Darkmere> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504221017.07453.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bd90a4fc-a4ed-470f-b18d-536959c079cb X-Archives-Hash: 4146ab48503a2388f80f5dd849bd8bb8 On Friday 22 April 2005 10:03 am, Spider wrote: > Yes, Will you provide a migration phase? > > That means, can you put busybox-shell to auto-conflict sash and > link /bin/sash to /bin/busybox-sh or what the binary is called? could be done > Oh, and unless you have another editor as binary built into your shell, > don't remove ed. A "trusted" editor is good. Sash is seldom used for > "My system is haxxored" however its often used for "I fucked up glibc" > and an editor is a handy thing, even if its as obscure as "ed" busybox comes with vi ... i could implement ed in busybox, i'd just rather not have to ;) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list