From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perch.kroah.org (mail.kroah.org [69.55.234.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3LLTaUt010568 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:29:37 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.10] (c-24-22-118-199.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.22.118.199]) (authenticated) by perch.kroah.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3LLTZi10962 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:29:35 -0700 Received: from greg by echidna.kroah.org with local (masqmail 0.2.19) id 1DOjEd-0jO-00 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:29:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:29:19 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ieee1394 useflag Message-ID: <20050421212919.GC2568@kroah.com> References: <200504212316.23573@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504212316.23573@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 2938cf6d-8bd4-4dc0-a23a-530870c20940 X-Archives-Hash: fdf6821aab048bd8373f5d0dc81d19e4 On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote: > There are currently 6 (7 after I'll commit new ffmpeg) ieee1394 use.local > flags. > I think this is worth moving it as a global useflag. > > Someone disagrees? Why is it a useflag at all? Does this mean I can create a new "usb" flag? :) thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list