From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3LBhCLU015531 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:43:12 GMT Received: from beu1.demon.co.uk ([83.105.51.149]) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DOa5W-000FhI-DU for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:43:18 +0000 From: Elfyn McBratney To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New apache stuff in testing -> =?utf-8?q?please=09package=2Emask?= it Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:43:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200504210548.29928@zippy.emcb.local> <1114083437.6170.3.camel@vmware.local.domain> In-Reply-To: <1114083437.6170.3.camel@vmware.local.domain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3631140.DzrLb5DAPJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504211243.30122@zippy.emcb.local> X-Archives-Salt: 43690643-1980-4805-bcff-660576ff7ba5 X-Archives-Hash: 02e316a0a6ac2f80a3459ecd06619e65 --nextPart3631140.DzrLb5DAPJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 21 Apr 2005 12:37, Paul Varner wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff > > (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new > > install layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages = in > > testing. I may have missed packages in the bug, hence this mail - you > > know best if your using new stuff. :) > > > > Please package.mask said ebuilds ASAP so we can get apache itself into > > package.mask. > > Even though I stated my opinion that I would like to see the new changes > package masked again, the consensus that I read on the thread disagreed > with that approach. > > My unsolicited opinion based upon the previous thread is since it is > already out of the bag, leave it in ~arch and actively work the bugs so > that you can get it to the point of being able to mark it stable. Seems, I've been speaking to the wrong people then. Anyways, this has=20 prompted loads of bugs being fixed, which might mean apache will go stable= =20 instead. Best, Elfyn =2D-=20 Elfyn McBratney http://beu.merseine.nu/ beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/ +------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD PGP Key Fingerprint: DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD --nextPart3631140.DzrLb5DAPJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCZ5HijUHll2nfF60RAu8vAJ0UORqkzR9Hh+RvsQjZXk2JA9ZcAwCcCnI5 LxMhz7X3Zhvhz1pZj2NcvD4= =j+Mw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3631140.DzrLb5DAPJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list