From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from iai.speak-friend.de (iai.speak-friend.de [62.75.222.128]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3KFPS3P023161 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:25:28 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.22] (pD9E747C4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.231.71.196]) by iai.speak-friend.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869A2238001 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:25:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Parpart Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated =?iso-8859-6?q?ebuilds=09back_into?= package.mask Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:25:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504160656.43452@zippy.emcb.local> <200504200936.40347.trapni@gentoo.org> <200504201059.56418.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200504201059.56418.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Face: $-3HTEy*5}2A{'R'VPim$,8KKX$l|:P^RhP{;yQ)g;]4isyohrOfk\)=?utf-8?q?Q=2Ep=23F3RWB=7D!m=24zn=0A=097=5CPUKBYRKDFUU=3A=5CZ+U=5Fa-/=5BhI?= =?utf-8?q?8DJZ?="WPC2j~}(N."(JB&VNb}kU&`> =?utf-8?q?9=3B=5FN=3BfnM=7BD=7B8=2EI+5=0A=09dg=60p=5EQ?=(:yE{eVgArPf190vEkbGis0vx];" =?utf-8?q?1O!L=7ByKN4J=5B4=27=7E=7Eh+o+=7D=2EgzkmqNs=60=7D=7C0uq8a=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?=25WQg=3F=3D=25y7X74tMWEkL=5DQQ?=(_Yc"m*aC+HD%!,6/k>L7S%'<}_B2&cI}/W(p+;rJ%2`0A<) =?utf-8?q?F=0A=09P7P=2E=60=3Dy=7C=7DU=7E=3F!?= List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10734629.TAqPpyEBW4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504201725.14914.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6349c4b2-60f4-43ab-b1fc-889e19061113 X-Archives-Hash: 1aab7a90f1764bdb3a38c91dfda9080f --nextPart10734629.TAqPpyEBW4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 20 April 2005 10:59 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:36, Christian Parpart wrote: > > And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to > > support this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed > > apache httpd 2.1 into the tree, so, that I don't have to live with the > > old shitty behavior again. > > > > Seriousely, why did we put all our power into those improvements when > > we're now about to revert mostly everything? > > I believe that most issues are with the new configuration setup. What > about checking for the old configuration format and in that case > providing the old configuration setup. If there is no old format (or > allready a working new format config file) use the new config system. I might be wrong, but... I do not think that this will be easily possible,= =20 because all modules would have to deel with this, too. Besides all this, suppose the case that we've an apache httpd 2.1-line woul= d=20 in the trees, someone emerged it (though, don't have 2.0.x installed), is=20 there be a way to get subversion with +apache2 useflag installed? apache-2.= 1=20 needs latest apr/apr-util's, I just hope that this wouldn't crash in any wa= y. Cya, Christian Parpart. =2D-=20 Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 17:23:03 up 28 days, 6:29, 0 users, load average: 0.26, 0.31, 0.34 --nextPart10734629.TAqPpyEBW4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCZnRaPpa2GmDVhK0RAqwgAJ4rv/vu5uHwFpJYrerTTnlwqyPi4gCfVoCG l1sXgVlJQrWHR1ldGAj3E7Y= =ASBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10734629.TAqPpyEBW4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list