Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated ebuilds back into package.mask

[Elfyn McBratney <beu@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]

On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 20:31, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Saturday 16 April 2005 14:38, Paul Varner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 06:56 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > > The way I see it, we have three options:
> > >  - package.mask (downgrades for those early adopters)
> > >  - keep the same layout (/etc/apache2/conf, etc.) and wait until 2.2 is
> > > out to change it
> > >  - have the newer apache ebuilds migrate from old-style to new-style
> > > config (very hard to do, but possible)
> >
> > As a user whose apache install is completely hosed at the moment due to
> > these changes, my recommendation is all the above, with it being package
> > masked immediately.
>
> I disagree. This will actually put you in an inconsistent state as the old
> apache overlaps with apr/apr-util. What I think would be the best solution
> is to undo the config changes, but keep the apr change in a new ebuild set
> that get's updated to (up or downgrading I don't care).

APR and APU are stand-alone and independent of apache, so there is no need to 
p.mask those libs.

Best,
Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney                                     http://beu.merseine.nu/
beu/irc.freenode.net                            http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc

PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD
PGP Key Fingerprint:
  DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9  B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]