From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3FEKqb2012500
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:20:53 GMT
Received: from p061198141037.ppp.prin.ne.jp ([61.198.141.37] helo=linux.box)
by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
id 1DMRgW-0007KW-1f
for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:20:41 +0000
Received: by linux.box (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D3DBD46A01; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:20:44 +0900 (JST)
From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT* and USE_EXPAND additions
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:20:43 +0900
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <200504132048.27042.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200504152214.59110.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20050415141814.5438cac1@snowdrop>
In-Reply-To: <20050415141814.5438cac1@snowdrop>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200504152320.43912.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: e41b7948-b39a-4926-8ad8-2ffbd9bdb3a1
X-Archives-Hash: 56d0456ab19c0ea596e1fd502f7d7793
On Friday 15 April 2005 22:18, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:14:59 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
>
> wrote:
> | If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I
> | was confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem
^not^a^
> | either. The bug is that 2.0.50 will die if two profiles in a cascade
> | define the same variable.
>
> Which should be fine, because no-one is even going to *think* about
> wanting sub-profile-specific USE_EXPAND. Right?
USE_EXPAND is not an incremental.
The only other settings that directly relate to ebuilds and currently live in
make.globals are CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. These should also be
moved into the tree. Any objections?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list