From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3FJqtKP014689 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:52:55 GMT Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72150A457DF; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:46 +0200 From: Maurice van der Pot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with things like -fpie in CFLAGS in environment? Message-ID: <20050415195246.GU8632@kfk4ever.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050412155953.GM8632@kfk4ever.com> <1113322225.8062.8.camel@Memoria.anyarch.net> <20050415192738.GT8632@kfk4ever.com> <1113594056.10691.7.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0zDq8CFkxn2hi9iJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1113594056.10691.7.camel@localhost> X-PGP-Key: http://www.kfk4ever.com/~griffon26/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.kfk4ever.com/ X-Archives-Salt: da309ac1-231a-4ceb-a5df-4e586ff4b529 X-Archives-Hash: a2c0cb3cfe012363e80d87fe19b9c4b0 --0zDq8CFkxn2hi9iJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:40:55PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: > > Why is -fno-pie being added by filter-flags anyway?=20 >=20 > Because with hardened gcc profiles PIE is the default behaviour. So, if > something doesn't work with pie (which is usually why one would filter > out -fpie), we need to add -fno-pie. That's not filtering, that's inverting. In this case I need filtering.=20 I can try to get the developers to change their makefiles, but none of that would help if I can't get -fpie and -fno-pie out of the user's CFLAGS. I could of course close any bugs that I would get because of these CFLAGS as invalid and suggest they use the appropriate gcc profile=20 instead. Would that be reasonable? Maurice. --=20 Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com --0zDq8CFkxn2hi9iJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCYBuOMGnpIbeahxwRAqRDAJ9N3XvYu7jjN0GreGHxqKFxAkKqigCgm9Nf 9xgM+nikT8mTazuWClUxzaE= =lbDk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0zDq8CFkxn2hi9iJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list