From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tiger.gg3.net (142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp [219.111.13.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3F0bxm9011786 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:38:00 GMT Received: (qmail 12059 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2005 09:37:58 +0900 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 09:37:58 +0900 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:37:55 +0900 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:37:55 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Message-ID: <20050415003755.GA10415@lion.gg3.net> References: <200504141054.35772.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050414090119.GC6594@sole.infis.univ.trieste.it> <20050414090618.GA15959@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> <20050414091110.GD6594@sole.infis.univ.trieste.it> <1113477489.28419.1.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <87r7hda2oy.fsf@gentoo.net9.org> <425E7B09.3040806@longlandclan.hopto.org> <1113492200.9616.96.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 50d41efb-f1a0-4b54-8a6e-9af805833d62 X-Archives-Hash: 9b89c6d20ad4dec4db4d294a805fc6e0 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maillog: 14/04/2005-14:10:34(-0600): Jason Wever types > On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > Reply-to-All is evil. You should be using Reply-to-List. I know that I > > sure don't need to get the same email both on and off-list. Off-list > > emails should be reserved only for when you explicitly do not want to > > send to the list and only to the original email's author. > > And just how many mail clients support reply-to-list (which in and of > itself doesn't have well defined standards and is not adhered to in any > specific way by the myriads of mailing list software packages out there)? > Not very many last I checked. "L" seems to work fine great in mutt. I do not have the word "gentoo" mentioned in my muttrc, but it properly got the address from the "List-Post" header. I also tried it on a "List-Post:" posting (that was CCed to @lists) and it was properly addressed to gentoo-dev@gentoo.org. Congratulations. There is at least one properly behaving mail client. It will be known how proper if it sets the Mail-FollowUp-To: header on this mail. > Best for now to deal with whether you want Reply-To to be altered or use > Reply-To all. I don't really care, but out of principle -- don't touch the header is my vote. -- \ Georgi Georgiev \ Apples have meant trouble since eden. -- \ / chutz@gg3.net / MaDsen Wikholm, mwikholm@at8.abo.fi / \ +81(90)2877-8845 \ \ --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXwzjfXO2NUT1EmYRAuxTAKDNpzdk5CHVl5wSj5lvJubrZIMcGACggdQo nj4Wf/I2NLxM5sLgMkfv3yU= =8rKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list