From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3B6RewH016226 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:27:41 GMT Received: from [62.254.189.226] (helo=snowdrop) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DKsOR-0004wV-G4 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:27:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop) by snowdrop with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DKsNL-0001zJ-R0 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:26:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:26:21 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? Message-ID: <20050411072621.6f27027e@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <200504102357.13801.trapni@gentoo.org> References: <425956D1.5040006@gentoo.org> <200504102027.05326.trapni@gentoo.org> <20050410193427.43968e1d@snowdrop> <200504102357.13801.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__11_Apr_2005_07_26_21_+0100_MpPaUi2pQvrdmhOP; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Archives-Salt: 49cd7396-7441-4e83-b843-2d5b9dab18ef X-Archives-Hash: 1040e731a1494dc1b65511e40dd48d9b --Signature_Mon__11_Apr_2005_07_26_21_+0100_MpPaUi2pQvrdmhOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:57:12 +0200 Christian Parpart wrote: | > SVN uses transactions and=20 | > changesets. These make a heck of a lot more sense if they're done on | > a per project basis.=20 |=20 | reason? Because you can pull out a meaningful and relevant changeset without having to arse around with path prefixes. | > Unlike with CVS, this makes a big difference -- SVN=20 | > revision IDs are actually meaningful,=20 |=20 | SVN repository IDs represent the state of the whole repository at a | given time, nothing more or less. Not repo IDs. Revision IDs. | Hmm... besides, the ASF is just having a single repository for all | their public projects (with about 1000+ contributors) w/o any | problems. So we should make the same mistakes as them? Sure, a single repo would be usable, but multiple repos would be a heck of a lot better. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__11_Apr_2005_07_26_21_+0100_MpPaUi2pQvrdmhOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCWhiP96zL6DUtXhERApvgAJ9vKusLjCPGI8cRjeJx10JHCiPdNACfWJ3s BEv6r5ROnD+3VdToyDk3v28= =j+Pn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__11_Apr_2005_07_26_21_+0100_MpPaUi2pQvrdmhOP-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list