From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from iai.speak-friend.de (iai.speak-friend.de [62.75.222.128]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3ALiL20028067 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:44:21 GMT Received: from battousai.surakware.net (p3E9E0351.dip.t-dialin.net [62.158.3.81]) by iai.speak-friend.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAC3238001 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:44:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Parpart Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:44:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <425956D1.5040006@gentoo.org> <42599AF5.6050103@gentoo.org> <20050410213521.GA4823@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20050410213521.GA4823@kroah.com> X-Face: $-3HTEy*5}2A{'R'VPim$,8KKX$l|:P^RhP{;yQ)g;]4isyohrOfk\)=?utf-8?q?Q=2Ep=23F3RWB=7D!m=24zn=0A=097=5CPUKBYRKDFUU=3A=5CZ+U=5Fa-/=5BhI?= =?utf-8?q?8DJZ?="WPC2j~}(N."(JB&VNb}kU&`> =?utf-8?q?9=3B=5FN=3BfnM=7BD=7B8=2EI+5=0A=09dg=60p=5EQ?=(:yE{eVgArPf190vEkbGis0vx];" =?utf-8?q?1O!L=7ByKN4J=5B4=27=7E=7Eh+o+=7D=2EgzkmqNs=60=7D=7C0uq8a=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?=25WQg=3F=3D=25y7X74tMWEkL=5DQQ?=(_Yc"m*aC+HD%!,6/k>L7S%'<}_B2&cI}/W(p+;rJ%2`0A<) =?utf-8?q?F=0A=09P7P=2E=60=3Dy=7C=7DU=7E=3F!?= List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2274324.NKhYiTmPPv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504102344.15874.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 08baac77-0c77-4984-9392-5460da2f1688 X-Archives-Hash: 798e43871df7bc661f51fa9289ea0bff --nextPart2274324.NKhYiTmPPv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 10 April 2005 11:35 pm, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:30:29PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > > A while back, we had to move the gentoo kernel patches out of the Gentoo > > CVS because we realised it conflicted with the old copyright assignment > > form: I have signed an agreement saying that everything I put in gentoo > > cvs will be copyrighted to Gentoo. That obviously isn't the case for > > kernel patches that I didn't write. > > > > We moved the kernel patches into a bitkeeper repo, and they've been the= re > > for a while. However, this might be clashing with the social contract, > > and costless BK is going away, so its time to move again. I'd love to > > host these in a Gentoo repo, preferably SVN, but would need to get that > > agreement revoked for me and the other kernel developers. Who do I need > > to speak to? > > Thanks for bringing this up, I was going to do so this week. I can get > the cvs data out of the bk tree, if we want to move it anywhere else, so > we will not loose the history (if that's an issue.) But we need to get > moved off of bkbits.net as soon as possible,=20 > and the gentoo server is=20 > not a current solution :( could you be please more specific? I mean. why isn't it a current solution?= =20 because SVN isn't right in place or because of the copyright problems still= =20 around or ...? thanks, Christian Parpart. =2D-=20 Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 23:42:51 up 18 days, 12:49, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.69, 0.75 --nextPart2274324.NKhYiTmPPv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCWZ4vPpa2GmDVhK0RAmvQAKCGXhE+fEqncO+Mxmo9putS+fJ9RgCePJsI 5IudFw4Nzco07MbmtKjyZE4= =lOei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2274324.NKhYiTmPPv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list