Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?

[Christian Parpart <trapni@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]

On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:32 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:27:51 +0200 Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
>
> wrote:
> | On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 18:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:39:45 -0400 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@gentoo.org>
> | >
> | > wrote:
> | > | Regarding GLEP 36[1], solar has asked me to try and figure out a
> | > | way to provide both CVS and Subversion for one repository and keep
> | > | them sync'd somehow.
> | >
> | > Please don't. This would mean we'd have to stick with all of the
> | > restrictions of CVS.
> |
> | We have to do that anyway until cvs is phased out.
>
> Eh? Er, no. We're already using SVN for a whole load of Gentoo projects,
> but we're currently hosting them off berlios rather than official Gentoo
> infrastructure. That's the purpose of this GLEP.

I see, there's a greater demand on this subject than I even thought 
about. I even expected that you'll all kill me for the whols SVN 
alternative thoughts I'm raising.

Christian Parpart.

-- 
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
 19:45:33 up 18 days,  8:51,  0 users,  load average: 0.92, 0.73, 0.60

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]