From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j37CetkR030737 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:40:56 GMT Received: from [62.254.189.226] (helo=snowdrop) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DJWJZ-0006bf-Cz for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:40:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop) by snowdrop with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJWIR-0005QR-Sr for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:39:43 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:39:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed Message-ID: <20050407133940.3d9a0521@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <200504071431.38634@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200503281806.17832@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <5568594a91e72e6cafce5b1d1c29ce80@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20050407130134.456f6a08@snowdrop> <200504071431.38634@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Thu__7_Apr_2005_13_39_40_+0100_8R/lIN.+BBSgdqM9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Archives-Salt: c6dab24d-6098-443d-a491-ba8f3be7cca8 X-Archives-Hash: 98b6eb23206e601c4c0b1e5a0f4d22e0 --Signature_Thu__7_Apr_2005_13_39_40_+0100_8R/lIN.+BBSgdqM9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:31:33 +0200 "Diego \"Flameeyes\" Petten=F2" wrote: | On Thursday 07 April 2005 14:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > The OS X sed is broken. Or, at least, it is not a satisfactory | > provider of sed-4, which is what we DEPEND upon. | Well osx's sed is just posix sed, exactly the same of bsd sed. | We depends on gsed for things which, imho, could be done using posix | sed. Mainly the position of -i param, or the douple -e (which could be | merged into a single expression). | Probably both osx sed and bsd sed could be used without a bit of a | trouble for portage purposes, with some tweaks here and there. OSX sed does not do -i at all. Read up on the original "why OSX cannot PROVIDE sed-4" discussion. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Thu__7_Apr_2005_13_39_40_+0100_8R/lIN.+BBSgdqM9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCVSoP96zL6DUtXhERApufAJwOBML22ES6vXCNbWfqCEBpouA3HgCg0Z7k 5qtAhAtiQ393VbNYBs7Y1lY= =gHkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Thu__7_Apr_2005_13_39_40_+0100_8R/lIN.+BBSgdqM9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list