From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j333tG1A023917 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:55:17 GMT Received: from p061204005153.ppp.prin.ne.jp ([61.204.5.153] helo=linux.box) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DHwCg-0007A9-Dk for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:55:16 +0000 Received: by linux.box (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E9BE46B91; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:55:10 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles (round 2) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:55:09 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42224847.1060703@gentoo.org> <1112460095.604.0.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <1112460673.7137.1.camel@amd64.anyarch.net> In-Reply-To: <1112460673.7137.1.camel@amd64.anyarch.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504031255.09565.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cb644004-c133-48b1-aca9-8f7e1e628bb6 X-Archives-Hash: f5466063f4338154f71cb951b59eb912 On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:51, Daniel Ostrow wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 11:41 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 16:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > Seeing that I added that output, I guess I should reply. The reason for > > > it was that only one profile per keyword will be checked at the moment. > > > Essentially, the output was both to make people aware of this fact and > > > to make sure people know *which* profile is being checked. > > > > > > I figure your going to tell me that all listed profiles should be > > > checked and I'd have to agree so, if it'll prevent the addition of > > > another useless file, I guess I'll get right on it. > > > > Give us a shout when you have something to test and I'll gladly fill up > > profiles.desc with the valid profiles. > > I'm going to be making at least 2 dev profiles over the next week for > ppc64, glad that will be able to be checked. > > Let us know when you need testers. http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/repoman-2.0.51.19.patch Changes: * All profiles listed in profiles.desc are checked. * Masked packages are not checked unless --include-masked is specified, when - repoman is being called at category or tree level, and - commit has not been specified. * Removed several expensive but seemingly useless operation for a 90% speedup. With regard to the useless operations, they were there to restore the trees and config objects to initial state but I can't find anything that actually modifies their states. I ran a couple of category checks with and without the patch and didn't get any differing results, but keep your eyes open anyway. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list