Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles (round 2)

[Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>]

On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:51, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 11:41 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 16:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > Seeing that I added that output, I guess I should reply. The reason for
> > > it was that only one profile per keyword will be checked at the moment.
> > > Essentially, the output was both to make people aware of this fact and
> > > to make sure people know *which* profile is being checked.
> > >
> > > I figure your going to tell me that all listed profiles should be
> > > checked and I'd have to agree so, if it'll prevent the addition of
> > > another useless file, I guess I'll get right on it.
> >
> > Give us a shout when you have something to test and I'll gladly fill up
> > profiles.desc with the valid profiles.
>
> I'm going to be making at least 2 dev profiles over the next week for
> ppc64, glad that will be able to be checked.
>
> Let us know when you need testers.

http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/repoman-2.0.51.19.patch

Changes:
* All profiles listed in profiles.desc are checked.
* Masked packages are not checked unless --include-masked is specified, when
  - repoman is being called at category or tree level, and
  - commit has not been specified.
* Removed several expensive but seemingly useless operation for a 90% speedup.

With regard to the useless operations, they were there to restore the trees 
and config objects to initial state but I can't find anything that actually 
modifies their states. I ran a couple of category checks with and without the 
patch and didn't get any differing results, but keep your eyes open anyway.

Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list