From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2VFJLnp010657
	for <gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:19:21 GMT
Received: from relay8.poste.it ([62.241.4.185])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DH1S3-0006QO-1Q
	for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:19:19 +0000
Received: from flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.23.151) by relay8.poste.it (7.2.052.3) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it)
        id 420CD9F7000786D6 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:19:20 +0200
From: "Diego \"Flameeyes\" =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" <flameeyes@users.berlios.de>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PAM related: pam_console ?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17:40 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <200503311517.10772@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200503311626.39302@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200503311001.14447.vapier@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200503311001.14447.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>, <mailto:gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org>, <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart5571437.TyW49kumro";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200503311717.44937@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: ded2251d-5dcd-4bf8-aba1-c8acf277207f
X-Archives-Hash: 997e3a1dd2c00908f02609926fa4329b

--nextPart5571437.TyW49kumro
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 31 March 2005 17:01, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this is so that we (1) dont have to force -fPIC onto libglib.a and (2) we
> dont have to move libglib.so into /lib
I know why it's there.. is also stated clearly on ebuild and the changelog =
:)

> eh, you're going to have 'bloat' regardless of using 1 ebuild or 10, it's
> just a matter of which kind of bloat you want :p ... and generally i'm
> against splitting packages
Well.. seeing how other things are getting done with plugins, as pam module=
s=20
are just plugins, for example xmms, bmp or gstreamer, the current trend is =
to=20
split the ebuilds, instead of adding a lot of useflags.

Also, counting that pam_console and the other optional pam_* modules aren't=
=20
part of original Linux-PAM makes me prefer having a different ebuild for th=
em=20
instead of a single largest one.

Well,  that's obviously IMHO. Having a virtual/pam and=20
virtual/pam-base-modules is enough to make the openpam interoperability i'd=
=20
like to have.

And just to make it clear, it's on Linux that I can't build pam_console, I=
=20
haven't tried on fbsd, anyway.

=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/

--nextPart5571437.TyW49kumro
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCTBSYe2h1+2mHVWMRAtXwAKDW54gG8YdW56ColDyOUm0N7rf73QCg3Tu7
QQrnvqmnv1hxhTjH9vLefGs=
=IK7N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5571437.TyW49kumro--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list