From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2VF1D9c010947 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:01:14 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DH1AV-0005ol-AD for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:01:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 16494 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2005 09:58:35 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 09:58:35 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PAM related: pam_console ? Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:01:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200503311517.10772@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200503310857.16900.vapier@gentoo.org> <200503311626.39302@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200503311626.39302@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503311001.14447.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j2VF1D9c010947 X-Archives-Salt: 856dda80-8b06-43b3-adac-195adce4d648 X-Archives-Hash: cb6b5bcb23da37c2b9e93c6b6f0df997 On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:26 am, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò wrote: > As I said is not a problem of bsd in this case. Just look at pam ebuild, is > a mess! it builds a static glib to be able to build pam_console, there's > conditional of all kinds... this is so that we (1) dont have to force -fPIC onto libglib.a and (2) we dont have to move libglib.so into /lib > Moving out pam_console (and the rest of optional pam modules, also) into > different ebuilds will make user ables to install what they need without > having a bloated ebuild with conditionals for everything. eh, you're going to have 'bloat' regardless of using 1 ebuild or 10, it's just a matter of which kind of bloat you want :p ... and generally i'm against splitting packages -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list