From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2TLhY9X013561 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:43:34 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DGOUo-0003Be-2B for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:43:34 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop) by snowdrop with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGOTs-0001g5-PH for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:42:36 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:42:34 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GTK und GTK2 Use Flag Message-ID: <20050329224234.3e3b4a74@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <1112132150.13737.9.camel@rivendell> References: <42492AB5.8080903@gmx.at> <200503291304.17256@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050329111138.GA10169@stud.seeling33.de> <200503291324.33892@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050329113538.GA4377@valinor.dynalias.net> <20050329115039.GB29694@exodus> <20050329130951.GA25810@valinor.dynalias.net> <20050329133906.GC29694@exodus> <20050329141948.GA13248@valinor.dynalias.net> <20050329153857.GA9499@stud.seeling33.de> <1112116825.23696.46.camel@powerix.local.c0ffeine.de> <1112132150.13737.9.camel@rivendell> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Tue__29_Mar_2005_22_42_34_+0100_2fLo7FUy.Rc5CXuI; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Archives-Salt: 33c1c146-2996-45b7-b2e3-e15024bab549 X-Archives-Hash: c99ca067691296f5f3a51753495c8dab --Signature_Tue__29_Mar_2005_22_42_34_+0100_2fLo7FUy.Rc5CXuI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:35:50 +0200 foser wrote: | Do it right this time this time, don't try to redo it in as much a | crappy way as it is now. The proposals here are as much time-context | dependant as the current solution is. I think it's been rather well illustrated that GTK+-1 support is not time dependent, and that GTK+-1 will be around for a very long time... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__29_Mar_2005_22_42_34_+0100_2fLo7FUy.Rc5CXuI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCScvM96zL6DUtXhERAl2CAJwMrHcXhOccpAV7kEVYq10dp00GmwCgrc/B BlHyR/HBwIY8PkP8EixWOI0= =ERmB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__29_Mar_2005_22_42_34_+0100_2fLo7FUy.Rc5CXuI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list