From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2TFd1iR021323 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:39:01 GMT Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGIo0-0000W8-3a for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:39:00 +0000 X-Envelope-From: stefan@binarchy.net X-Envelope-To: Received: from dice.seeling33.de (pD9E7656B.dip.t-dialin.net [217.231.101.107]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j2TFcqjI021215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:38:53 +0200 Received: by dice.seeling33.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 88C221682DC; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:38:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:38:57 +0200 From: Stefan Sperling To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GTK und GTK2 Use Flag Message-ID: <20050329153857.GA9499@stud.seeling33.de> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <42492AB5.8080903@gmx.at> <200503291304.17256@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050329111138.GA10169@stud.seeling33.de> <200503291324.33892@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050329113538.GA4377@valinor.dynalias.net> <20050329115039.GB29694@exodus> <20050329130951.GA25810@valinor.dynalias.net> <20050329133906.GC29694@exodus> <20050329141948.GA13248@valinor.dynalias.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050329141948.GA13248@valinor.dynalias.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Spam-Score: (-1.349) AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Archives-Salt: 81205cbf-5a76-4a27-a4f9-64bcfccd0428 X-Archives-Hash: 525ddd410ad6f2cfffdbb0487ae81635 On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:19:48PM +0100, David Morgan wrote: > So, either package maintainers would have to do this (which does seem > like something that's likely to happen) or 1 person/a few people > would have to change all the relevant ebuilds, which would require a lot > of work (and requires whoever's doing it to work out which options are > applicable to each package). > > I think the second way is the only way that this'd actually get done, > but it requires one or more volunteers. (I'd happily do it, but it's not > really possible without being a dev). I think the first way is definitely possible, but would probably take much longer than the second. Anyway, I'd be willing to help out in case people decide on way number two. But I'm not a dev either :) -- stefan PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list