From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2TBQFqW006694 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:26:15 GMT Received: from relay5.poste.it ([62.241.4.67]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGErO-0002ta-ET for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:26:14 +0000 Received: from flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.183) by relay5.poste.it (7.2.052.3) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it) id 4210C214001202D2 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:26:13 +0200 From: "Diego \"Flameeyes\" =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GTK und GTK2 Use Flag Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:24:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42492AB5.8080903@gmx.at> <200503291304.17256@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050329111138.GA10169@stud.seeling33.de> In-Reply-To: <20050329111138.GA10169@stud.seeling33.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1292700.MnkXpyc72q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503291324.33892@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 77040981-cb3f-42d6-a53b-3f4804f8400a X-Archives-Hash: 35bc97de5234cc681b2ee3fac21e2809 --nextPart1292700.MnkXpyc72q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 29 March 2005 13:11, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Petten=F2 wrote: > > -gtk +gtk2 is a no-op. > why? As Brian said, gtk2 depends on gtk. Just as a practical example, take ethereal, which could be built without gu= i=20 support, just using tethereal. If you build it with -gtk +gtk2, it will build tethereal, not ethereal. I=20 submitted some time ago a patch to make this a more logical behaviour, but = I=20 needed to change it to suit the same behaviour of other packages. See bug=20 #81055. Take also amule which you can find on bugzilla as an example, which can be= =20 built without gtk support, and on which gtk2 support depends on gtk. Or wxGTK in which +wxnogtk flag is used to disable gtk1 support (there's gt= k2=20 flag but no gtk flag). I still think this is illogical, but I can't do much on this. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/ --nextPart1292700.MnkXpyc72q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCSTrxe2h1+2mHVWMRAhlrAKDZQ19Txa3Sib/6fOZARlba3ISVvgCfRKKz 1zRNo3C27ZMPW44LR/6ArVo= =hG9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1292700.MnkXpyc72q-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list