[gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 956 bytes --]

I've added {vim,gvim,vim-core}-6.3.068 to the tree in package.mask. I'd
like them to get a bit of testing before I unleash them upon ~arch,
since they have some fairly non-trivial changes. I'm mostly interested
in whether the vimrc works, whether vim scp://blah/ still works and
whether it bombs out with some weird error during the build... Oh, and
whether editing your make.conf has sane highlighting or not...

I finally switched to using x.y.z rather than abusing x.y-r. The -r
stuff was for historical reasons -- I was previously leaving it on the
assumption that agriffis wanted it that way, but it turns out that he
inherited that from someone else and doesn't like it either :)

Here's hoping the mailing list gods don't eat this message or sit on it
for several hours...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Michael Kohl]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 954 bytes --]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:37:23 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I'm mostly interested in whether the vimrc works, 

It does.

> whether vim scp://blah/ still works 

It does.

> and whether it bombs out with some weird error during the build... 

It compiles, ship it! ;)

> and whether editing your make.conf has sane highlighting or not...

At the moment I can't remember if this already happened with previous
versions (doh), but ALSA_CARDS gets highlighted differently than
VIDEO_CARDS. And that it highlights LDFLAGS as an error is on purpose I
guess?

If you need anything more specific tell me, maybe I can test it before I
go afk for the next few days...

Cheers,
Michael

-- 
web@citizen428.net                                 citizen428@gentoo.org
http://citizen428.net/                http://dev.gentoo.org/~citizen428/
GnuPG key: 0x90CA09E3/4D21 916E DBCE 72B8 CDC5  BD87 DE2D 91A2 90CA 09E3

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Aaron Walker]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Kohl wrote:


> At the moment I can't remember if this already happened with previous
> versions (doh), but ALSA_CARDS gets highlighted differently than
> VIDEO_CARDS.

VIDEO_CARDS has been recognized since the 20050130 release.  It's in the list
of "recognized but not handled specially" things, and more than likely ciaranm
didn't think of ALSA_CARDS at the time.  I'll let him handle that one though in
the case he didn't add it on purpose.

> And that it highlights LDFLAGS as an error is on purpose I
> guess?

Yes.

Cheers
- --
Nefer deley zee indeeng ooff a meeteeng oor zee begeenning ooff a cuckteeel huoor.
Bork Bork Bork!

Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@gentoo.org>
[ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim | web-apps ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCRA+JC3poscuANHARAlXFAJ9m+unP/EK13ecw8mIGFoaxRhsA7QCgtgXf
VmqlJmhLV7kz3Pl5MFszWz0=
=GtjZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Paul Varner]

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 03:37 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I've added {vim,gvim,vim-core}-6.3.068 to the tree in package.mask. I'd
> like them to get a bit of testing before I unleash them upon ~arch,
> since they have some fairly non-trivial changes. I'm mostly interested
> in whether the vimrc works, whether vim scp://blah/ still works and
> whether it bombs out with some weird error during the build... Oh, and
> whether editing your make.conf has sane highlighting or not...

I don't use gvim, so I only tested vim-core and vim

* No weird errors during the build
* vimrc appears to be working, i.e. I don't see anything strange
* I've never used vim scp://blah/ before. The behavior is that is scp's
the file over to a tmp file and opens the tmp file for editing.
* make.conf looks good except PORTAGE_TMPFS is not highlighted the same
as the other PORTAGE_ variables

-- 
My Gentoo stuff: http://varnerfamily.org/pvarner/gentoo
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Ferris McCormick]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> I've added {vim,gvim,vim-core}-6.3.068 to the tree in package.mask. I'd
> like them to get a bit of testing before I unleash them upon ~arch,
> since they have some fairly non-trivial changes. I'm mostly interested
> in whether the vimrc works,

Seems to.

> whether vim scp://blah/ still works

Yes

> whether it bombs out with some weird error during the build... Oh, and
> whether editing your make.conf has sane highlighting or not...
>

No, it doesn't bomb on build; yes, make.conf has some highlighting.

>
> Here's hoping the mailing list gods don't eat this message or sit on it
> for several hours...
>

They didn't eat it; I have no idea how long they sat on it.


- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@gentoo.org>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCRCEAQa6M3+I///cRAiTOAJ42S/Pyfaqwy/JOEhwNUKCqm9tmtwCgsZ6p
5FavvYFdSFM92/lsu+eWuSs=
=3F6D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Sami Samhuri]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 699 bytes --]

* On Fri Mar-25-2005 at 03:37:23 AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh said:
> I've added {vim,gvim,vim-core}-6.3.068 to the tree in package.mask. I'd
> like them to get a bit of testing before I unleash them upon ~arch,
> since they have some fairly non-trivial changes. I'm mostly interested
> in whether the vimrc works,

Ok here.

> whether vim scp://blah/ still works and

Haven't used this feature before, seems to work as I'd expect it to.

> whether it bombs out with some weird error during the build...

Nope.

> Oh, and whether editing your make.conf has sane highlighting or not...

make.conf highlights fine.

Things seem to be in order over here as well.

-- 
Sami Samhuri

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim-6.3.068 needs testing

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:18:01 -0500 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| > At the moment I can't remember if this already happened with
| > previous versions (doh), but ALSA_CARDS gets highlighted differently
| > than VIDEO_CARDS.
| 
| VIDEO_CARDS has been recognized since the 20050130 release.  It's in
| the list of "recognized but not handled specially" things, and more
| than likely ciaranm didn't think of ALSA_CARDS at the time.  I'll let
| him handle that one though in the case he didn't add it on purpose.

I didn't add it because it isn't in the expand list and I kinda forgot
about it... It'll be in the next release of gentoo-syntax.

| > And that it highlights LDFLAGS as an error is on purpose I
| > guess?
| 
| Yes.

At least until vapier gives us his "LDFLAGS you're allowed to use" doc,
yeah.

Ok, looks like I didn't screw stuff up with this one, and that I didn't
miss anything that needed to handle three part versions rather than two.
I'll remove it from package.mask sometime soon. Thanks guys.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]