From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2N1Uu4F016914 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:30:56 GMT Received: from s010602608cdb4440.vn.shawcable.net ([24.87.161.251] helo=mail.ectrolinux.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuhz-0007AW-D3 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:30:55 +0000 Received: from entro.nv.ectrolinux.com (entro.nv.ectrolinux.com [172.16.1.3]) by mail.ectrolinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FCEBC353 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:30:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Anthony Gorecki To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-arch ambiguous? Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:28:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <46059ce10503221316492b0dfc@mail.gmail.com> <200503221707.59066.agorecki@ectrolinux.com> <20050323011744.514ca341@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050323011744.514ca341@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4388341.tFMSg9NQsU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503221728.03918.agorecki@ectrolinux.com> X-Archives-Salt: c16b6b79-6639-4565-8971-c53bff6d3065 X-Archives-Hash: b060d11b5ff1ce42adad3403370c92e9 --nextPart4388341.tFMSg9NQsU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:17 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Have you any idea just how frickin' hard that would be? Unfortunately. A few simple scripts could be made to shorten the required=20 amount of manual conversions; at the least, it would be nothing like=20 segregating the KDE ebuilds again. If all else fails, I'm certain that we=20 could enslave ferringb and assign him to the task. > The names are=20 > nice, clear, concise and obvious to people who have to work with them on > a regular basis. "NGSCB" is perfectly clear to many Microsoft employees and those with an=20 obfuscation shredder-- it may not be so clear to end users, news reporters= =20 and potential critics. Likewise, having a category named as a single letter= ,=20 for example, might be perfectly clear to the developers and developer=20 community members, but it would be obscure to everyone else. =2D-=20 Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Linux Foundation --nextPart4388341.tFMSg9NQsU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQkDGI78NHCarD3E0AQK70g//YqfTtKAvC+mWS1t8A+7f5+0jKs4pN/Cr 9p9tQBXA7Qlr11jYfuRldkhJcY+ItCPPx6A7UAS0DGmER8evaw5gdcs81a/cMuJ/ ig7PM/+5OxxoUaAPbekXhT0zE2Q/w/XabGGzPlnCTaBQ3O7i9Zw+1oHOCCL6IAjZ 80QERW1XdPN0ytHjZ4zwNl265tAesXe/ffsbf2bW/os+WzCZWVt8eGh4XlVr1n8v QDFO/lfEQiw59mfrTdYyjgkfICAvyq5C//toSANKDwqbSuVY2mdDrWQoF3LjxUhS 2k8fc9fTUynEhCy2DET3j9FgzxB94oNxZ7IY4Edzf3UtZbfprkXa1LIEhz+mrQOE GLLmsoYUe4pkWyFpuCuFCsnLTO1cNapNvykPMDt4BOfijPFAWdmqUXNtHrvrUBz8 nGGL1izmy3b9csJkAmkPnPLSUVwgzUbiZ9KtZ8FKZyjUB5SXZxSK7gpK4XW4lXqj KuwtIR/EWzs+/SYDwQvQctNUZ3Rgl7MX5NxQMYC86l+s/XvCxt/QWMQFO1EGIyli HSTS5Y50ZjsPcB0pGjnQGCZnCxKgGcRVuM1vRl4k1wUaUcnzGlNZaLlF09t/6nSn v7Ji+wwu3ztpNoMUg8eq6jC8/6wSZcdconTUsckfAVCViaDUYNII9w0f/yhBg7cK IWNqqU9oyfo= =DaHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4388341.tFMSg9NQsU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list