From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2N1Pmjf009650 for <gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:25:48 GMT Received: from s010602608cdb4440.vn.shawcable.net ([24.87.161.251] helo=mail.ectrolinux.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDud1-0002Jv-K1 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:25:48 +0000 Received: from entro.nv.ectrolinux.com (entro.nv.ectrolinux.com [172.16.1.3]) by mail.ectrolinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A67BC353 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:25:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Anthony Gorecki <agorecki@ectrolinux.com> To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/ftp VS /home/ftp Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:22:53 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050320234905.77953d16@localhost> <200503220922.02598.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050323010127.40bc09ff@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050323010127.40bc09ff@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>, <mailto:gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org>, <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1584388.TCulBthkn1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503221722.56117.agorecki@ectrolinux.com> X-Archives-Salt: e326e4f1-325e-4c31-bd3b-a91b60f850fb X-Archives-Hash: 0e7997cca7dc15bbf11022ff4ffba454 --nextPart1584388.TCulBthkn1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Aren't you looking forward to some insanely complicated srvapp-config > tool? One more application to package.mask :) I was meaning to follow this thread (I filed the bug report), however my=20 primary mail server suffered a catastrophic failure recently and didn't com= e=20 back online until yesterday. Regarding /var/ftp versus /srv (or a subdirectory thereof), which is chosen= =20 really isn't a concern to me as long as ProFTPD's home directory is moved o= ut=20 of /home. As previous posts have mentioned, it also doesn't make sense to=20 have multiple "serving" directory roots. Unless /var/www is moving=20 to /srv, /var/ftp seems to be the most sensible choice for the FTP daemons. =2D-=20 Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Linux Foundation --nextPart1584388.TCulBthkn1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQkDE778NHCarD3E0AQJy1hAAu8QxiXys9Jkf0kpUaWAkyMnPgAtjtK3Y ko0c9qDq9NxGD3mzdkFctBlLuw/yTcSQ8gQNQWAmaHFmXhVfEUvQ82BQMZDBN9ZO CXsj6IVr2D63qHqycZzx4QV8KKFbweuQjvT60ehXxmHykgDqIocLxLhe/MGnyEJp Ahfx1jXeQN89RfaUQyQlsnfeGLQD+Ud84nSGxjTu8/vM8LSRfekUZOYMKA20sACa +49T0Cho442nm1C1ZiUUBHv57hcbimzZYiwMKCtW0lhQjLqZ2mkibUrE4Lv0qlh1 Qd/LtX1hSEX/hy5jPmjuMY/8prD7y9e74GZAc32H1+6X+IjReKs527wf+uJ/Mjey Ziwl5WW96QL4CpMSmO2dluHIqKbHmqbUZlcHVqrZFPFd21cgQ1LYTkjmn1OtVqVQ YzQaDlVxXFOn9vOK+8cnco4eiwuokVx4EGTJFTKJX4L3nZzEpCxLWllipS0QRj4f S82r9jAHr9gTKVde4sUNyO6GsnTaPgvkzxwaVjAQPH80+kzv0x9vUz3rS9JCh5Dt g2EZ6W1GJHgcSTyCJWUxxAVKc2T/zHiw/soHWbrH4A9E54iyfi+qi1YhsHZ2oZBu IHDm4n0rNZFtDdiqnCQwE6fcUUdfDdRIG1lpgKtXBvBIuLT0ioJTTsOPQcdB289N 1jG5juLS8Os= =dRCq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1584388.TCulBthkn1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list