From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2N1Apmd030030 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:10:51 GMT Received: from s010602608cdb4440.vn.shawcable.net ([24.87.161.251] helo=mail.ectrolinux.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuOY-0008HZ-7k for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:10:50 +0000 Received: from entro.nv.ectrolinux.com (entro.nv.ectrolinux.com [172.16.1.3]) by mail.ectrolinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA21BC353 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:10:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Anthony Gorecki To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-arch ambiguous? Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:07:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <46059ce10503221316492b0dfc@mail.gmail.com> <20050322212134.0527db83@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050322212134.0527db83@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3401036.6t8LPzAkSL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503221707.59066.agorecki@ectrolinux.com> X-Archives-Salt: 099a3546-fc9e-42f7-b912-cff27ee70822 X-Archives-Hash: fda2f34c54d54edfc63ac7520d668f1a --nextPart3401036.6t8LPzAkSL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:21 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > wrote: > | Possibilities for it include: > | app-architecture (apps for designing things or archetecture specific > | programs?) app-archive > | > | possibly others, seems like renaming to app-archive would clear that > | up and 3 letters isnt _that_ much to ask :/ > > Read the metadata.xml :) "app-architecture" was my the interpretation of "app-arch" until I read thi= s=20 thread, so Dan isn't alone in his feelings towards that name. app-archive=20 would seem to make the most sense. Looking at other categories, app-benchmarks is much more clear than app-ben= c. Similarly, app-anti could also be construed as a variety of things, just as= I=20 believe app-lap would tend to invite carefully placed comments to the=20 developers at opportune moments. "RTM" is always an easy answer, but renaming the category would be more=20 helpful. =2D-=20 Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Linux Foundation --nextPart3401036.6t8LPzAkSL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQkDBbr8NHCarD3E0AQIYDw/+PMyrbH4NomWzyA9toZOqtvyUB95PaKrs eyR6otFVBhZ/3M5wcp0tP+AH/7LUumDHUKpKOvt2yr5wQ3KEbWavbRIH++Ri/wiW oUTe0Mx7yvohUysnmu4F0XkVU6qZOi6POqpiyWoydo8KyEd8LZV0W2cAKsG5/IIL eWjAvjsTNVGAsy9qIYMNBWUTj5yMDBZuhjfRXF+xXKbNSbT8QVEKsrV64E0O7syj hme+3yMleRhrt+owiet6/phzwdBUrWQbU9qhAPYj5fa6rCaIlGQBRa4ldaok323B q+9zcYWfaw361HPX0EdxVE/Gjl8x5oTFwdO8gYKS4Wl444wwnKELLGpp0kPi//an ELQaQ/DqZCcsPsMJ9Yw7Ls15zpt/3XuC/r/bQycMxHbhpmCQ4nkdrg2qUco4jygj DLNsXZ0slgzY2U4pB+j92tNfHZ61WTy+UZSqeQwJzoKIZZKFAXaFLK45zcc3uyJV JH2275IvicnobkOZScw7snIp3wBCNhMiDavFU+EY1n3J8m7g2U5NLRIly8Yrewzh 1EP3a7orQkFonSIub4Limq8dA28yK96KWF8JkrK4Jl79Fq0TEKKAH5vyw76mbW1A s/ekleRm3PIX+lNnckRwR0w/XXOlKEcvjFWLG+zB9vHWJ1gVF5dIuiVloluNpne9 JqWxlOnnQhs= =+yRB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3401036.6t8LPzAkSL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list