From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2LLCItl006078 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:12:19 GMT Received: from c-24-10-82-41.client.comcast.net ([24.10.82.41] helo=phaenix.haell.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDUCA-0000KB-Bp for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:12:18 +0000 Received: by phaenix.haell.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1BBC15BB485; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:12:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:12:17 -0800 From: Drake Wyrm To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mmxext flag Message-ID: <20050321211217.GA28215@phaenix.haell.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org References: <1111393195.7919.50.camel@rift.ath.cx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1111393195.7919.50.camel@rift.ath.cx> X-Arch: athlon_tbird-gentoo-linux-gnu X-Fnord: There is no conspiracy X-Fortune: Eat shit and die a virgin! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: a47b44d4-a7a9-4ace-9c7d-465c9248153b X-Archives-Hash: 2f60f6c9557c50ebcc3dfdc7f54e99d6 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2005-03-21T09:19:53+0100, David Holm wrote: > Isn't mmxext the same as mmx2 btw? Basically, yeah. "MMX2" is the trade name for the "mmxext" instruction set. Or "mmxext" is the flag that indicates the presence of the "MMX2" instruction set. However you want to look at it. Either way, if you want an authoritative source as to which to use, I'd suggest /proc/cpuinfo. --=20 Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkI/OLEACgkQQWVmeKdhp/KmFQCfVk8vjk5a8wGI40SpnpgSNenZ kGgAn36boVaQRuJ9skv88ZOFAIEVCLxn =K7Dq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from phaenix.haell.com (c-24-10-82-41.client.comcast.net [24.10.82.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2LLCKP1006067 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:12:21 GMT Received: by phaenix.haell.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1BBC15BB485; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:12:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:12:17 -0800 From: Drake Wyrm To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mmxext flag Message-ID: <20050321211217.GA28215@phaenix.haell.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org References: <1111393195.7919.50.camel@rift.ath.cx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1111393195.7919.50.camel@rift.ath.cx> X-Arch: athlon_tbird-gentoo-linux-gnu X-Fnord: There is no conspiracy X-Fortune: Eat shit and die a virgin! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 1009ff8b-7971-42f8-9c6d-6e0d3c49ea6f X-Archives-Hash: 4f6ed6f1b709f46f00be5d2ec0d56a63 Message-ID: <20050321211217.7tyF61YEMfrc0oR2PRbYu6l_hD3xEWWPz5xH170oKU0@z> --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2005-03-21T09:19:53+0100, David Holm wrote: > Isn't mmxext the same as mmx2 btw? Basically, yeah. "MMX2" is the trade name for the "mmxext" instruction set. Or "mmxext" is the flag that indicates the presence of the "MMX2" instruction set. However you want to look at it. Either way, if you want an authoritative source as to which to use, I'd suggest /proc/cpuinfo. --=20 Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkI/OLEACgkQQWVmeKdhp/KmFQCfVk8vjk5a8wGI40SpnpgSNenZ kGgAn36boVaQRuJ9skv88ZOFAIEVCLxn =K7Dq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list