From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2KGaXX9003823 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:36:34 GMT Received: from [192.168.9.101] (cpe-66-25-88-87.satx.res.rr.com [66.25.88.87]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j2KGaT8H027158; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:36:30 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <423D9F7F.2010103@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:06:23 -0600 From: Daniel Goller User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050304) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org CC: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary of PPC team meeting References: <20050319203402.GC8866@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> <20050319205602.2b3bc787@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050319205602.2b3bc787@snowdrop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA9D0AB7883A892A609F93F26" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Archives-Salt: e348adad-b66a-45b4-8661-9c811b040d20 X-Archives-Hash: 862b73432ec61850cbe0eb0018deab8a Message-ID: <20050320160623._LQGH-x4ZGaVC-8j3SmU9MoozteH8r-a89tvcse-Xmw@z> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA9D0AB7883A892A609F93F26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:34:02 +0100 Lars Weiler wrote: > | That means, we will work an a common-profile with sub-profiles for ppc > | and ppc64. A first target-date would be the 2005.1 release. The > | masterplan[tm] for the team-merge should be presented at the next > | meeting (in about four weeks). > > Is the ultimate aim a merged keyword like we did for sparc64 + sparc32 > -> sparc? If so, please don't use manson's script :) > > It'd be nice to see x86/amd64 going this way as well. I mean, we can fit > mips under one keyword, and there's far more difference there than there > is between a 386 and an opteron. > and i still can't see how amd64 devs would like to be lost in the void that we call x86 --------------enigA9D0AB7883A892A609F93F26 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPZ+FUpKYMelfdYERAozaAJ4/mcXoY2c/RTqztEimtvTMGwTQiACfXVY4 BHO/w3R6l5DkcVf21kJWFgU= =cJlh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA9D0AB7883A892A609F93F26-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list