From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2HIidhi012792 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:44:40 GMT Received: from smtp3.actcom.co.il ([192.114.47.65]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DBzz3-0008Pn-Hb for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:44:38 +0000 Received: from alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (l85-130-132-135.broadband.actcom.net.il [85.130.132.135]) by smtp3.actcom.co.il (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2HIiWrq005007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:44:37 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net with esmtp; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:11:02 +0200 id 00F933F1.4239D646.00000BBA From: Dan Armak Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE split ebuilds Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:11:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <423736A9.5040101@tomaw.org> <200503162229.21736.danarmak@gentoo.org> <4238AE1B.7030301@tomaw.org> In-Reply-To: <4238AE1B.7030301@tomaw.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1420996.3HqgAtO4qS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503172111.01706.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a58c1071-0aca-4c4e-9922-97359cc0e675 X-Archives-Hash: 7f45d410ea6a5414cb0f619f6fc1b5da --nextPart1420996.3HqgAtO4qS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:07, Tom Wesley wrote: > I can't disagree that p'masking a bucket-load of packages, all at > different versions will be a pain. Also, upgrading etc may require a > small army of gnome's (pun intended) to complete the task in a timely > manner. Indeed. Which is why I don't want to do this. > > Do any kde applications release outside of kde's main releases? (I have > a vague recollection of kopete doing this, but no others) Usually they stop when, or soon after, they are made part of an official=20 kde.org package. I can't recall any app that does this right now. Anyway, f= or=20 the very few that do, we can include extra releases with made-up version=20 numbers (or dates) that sort of make sense. These cases are so rare that th= is=20 doesn't fall into the 'confusing users' category IMHO. =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart1420996.3HqgAtO4qS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCOdZFUI2RQ41fiVERArbBAJ0d7zg4iq1JkJkMT6Rvsp3qGFpDNgCeO3tb 3BINhlQOzAAwTpbhIUDLXQQ= =ZV32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1420996.3HqgAtO4qS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list