From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2FN5kSY018754 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:05:46 GMT Received: from 142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp ([219.111.13.142] helo=tiger.gg3.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DBL6f-0001HF-Ok for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:05:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 31575 invoked by uid 89); 16 Mar 2005 08:05:44 +0900 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 08:05:44 +0900 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:05:43 +0900 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:05:43 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT and ROOT!='/' Message-ID: <20050315230543.GB7990@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <4235BFB0.70907@rle.ru> <4236004E.1010007@gentoo.org> <1110860664.11759.3.camel@matrix.brianandsara.net> <20050315065600.GA5908@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> <20050315161413.GA17344@lion.gg3.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 86fd220b-ef90-4d8b-a800-903742beb151 X-Archives-Hash: a74106c1878d3851548c572e44649b0d maillog: 15/03/2005-12:01:47(-0600): Brian Jackson types > On 10:14:14 am 2005-03-15 Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > maillog: 15/03/2005-08:26:49(-0600): Brian Jackson types > > > I have a bug filed for that too, but it's probably going to be a > > > while before it's fixed. From what I've been told, it's not > > > trivial to fix it because some of the config stuff isn't very > > > well abstracted. > > > > It isn't? Are we talking about the same thing? After all, the > > locations are just variables, that only need to be prefixed with > > something. Could we get some input from whoever told you this? > > make.conf is easy. The profile isn't as easy. /etc/portage isn't easy > at all. That's the basics. You'd have to ask the portage guys for more > in depth info. I was hoping to get a response from them here. Portage guys, you there? -- / Georgi Georgiev / From 0 to "what seems to be the problem / \ chutz@gg3.net \ officer" in 8.3 seconds. -- Ad for the new \ / +81(90)6266-1163 / VW Corrado / -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list