From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2EFdEcM002684 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:39:15 GMT Received: from himura.mylair.de ([217.172.177.14]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DArez-0002ep-G8 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:39:13 +0000 Received: from battousai.surakware.net (p3E9E0FD9.dip.t-dialin.net [62.158.15.217]) by himura.mylair.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F3B79C004 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:39:12 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Parpart Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] apache and ~arch Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:39:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050313172441.GA21923@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20050314144341.3017e91b@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050314144341.3017e91b@snowdrop> X-Face: $-3HTEy*5}2A{'R'VPim$,8KKX$l|:P^RhP{;yQ)g;]4isyohrOfk\)=?utf-8?q?Q=2Ep=23F3RWB=7D!m=24zn=0A=097=5CPUKBYRKDFUU=3A=5CZ+U=5Fa-/=5BhI?= =?utf-8?q?8DJZ?="WPC2j~}(N."(JB&VNb}kU&`> =?utf-8?q?9=3B=5FN=3BfnM=7BD=7B8=2EI+5=0A=09dg=60p=5EQ?=(:yE{eVgArPf190vEkbGis0vx];" =?utf-8?q?1O!L=7ByKN4J=5B4=27=7E=7Eh+o+=7D=2EgzkmqNs=60=7D=7C0uq8a=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?=25WQg=3F=3D=25y7X74tMWEkL=5DQQ?=(_Yc"m*aC+HD%!,6/k>L7S%'<}_B2&cI}/W(p+;rJ%2`0A<) =?utf-8?q?F=0A=09P7P=2E=60=3Dy=7C=7DU=7E=3F!?=, , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1819533.rVD77kzsGq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503141639.04696.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: aafc523a-a3d1-4b83-b805-a45a7eeb5ec7 X-Archives-Hash: 0d598c458164033e28d39891ce498ab7 --nextPart1819533.rVD77kzsGq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 14 March 2005 3:43 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:24:41 -0600 Grant Goodyear > wrote: > | However, I don't believe that ~arch should be used for ebuilds > | that one _knows_ have broken functionality. For such cases we > | have package.mask. > > Indeed. It's in the developer docs and it's in the quiz. And yet... > > http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/hollow/2005/03/14/apache_dithering He still does great work. So, please don't stick on words written down in h= ot=20 times. > > I can understand that breaking the system isn't a very good idea and > > people will complain, but this does not count for the testing branch. > > *sigh* Er, no. If you *know* it's broken, don't stick it in ~arch. If > it has no known issues, but hasn't been widely tested, then ~arch is > fine, but not if it's completely h0rked. =46YI, mod_php wasn't "completely borked". It's just not been unmasked at t= he=20 same time as the others went out of the hardmask state. > For how long have these people been developers and who were their > mentors? I'm starting to think that this wasn't a simple mistake -- > rather, that it's a complete misunderstanding of what the different > KEYWORDS levels mean... I - in my case - have learned my lessons from this - who cares. Regards, Christian Parpart. =2D-=20 Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 16:27:26 up 136 days, 8:57, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.21, 0.24 --nextPart1819533.rVD77kzsGq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNbAYPpa2GmDVhK0RAqp8AJ0VVqhXe9rBxsj+8tthI+hI2FS1ZwCggt// PHAXf5hPjpYcZ1/DfCvfjeI= =HsiH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1819533.rVD77kzsGq-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list