From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2DJFgnO007301 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:15:43 GMT Received: from smtp1.actcom.co.il ([192.114.47.64]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAYYv-0007pO-3G for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:15:41 +0000 Received: from alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (l85-130-135-178.broadband.actcom.net.il [85.130.135.178]) by smtp1.actcom.co.il (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2DJFZ6i004611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:15:40 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net with esmtp; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:27:04 +0200 id 00CB4EB9.42349408.00002756 From: Dan Armak Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:27:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200503131949.41001.adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de> In-Reply-To: <200503131949.41001.adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1348338.gGPtbXpQNA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503132127.03938.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8770fb0d-b52a-472e-b433-c1a6f0420379 X-Archives-Hash: e0050ffa7a7de52e26ed954163dac079 --nextPart1348338.gGPtbXpQNA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:49, Adrian Lambeck wrote: > Hello everybody, > I filed a GLEP this weekend. > It has to do with "Automated consistency checks for ebuilds" > > Please have a look at it and tell me what you think: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0035.html Sorry if I'm missing the obvious, but doesn't this describe precisely what= =20 repoman's already doing? People already run automated repoman scans of the= =20 tree and mail developers who own broken ebuilds. (If that's not on official= =20 gentoo infrastructure, it'd be nice for it to be.) Yet the GLEP doesn't eve= n=20 mention repoman. As for closing trivial user-reported bugs about eg bad SRC_URI, I've never= =20 really been bothered by it. It only takes a few seconds to write 'fixed' an= d=20 click on 'Fixed', 'Commit'... =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart1348338.gGPtbXpQNA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNJQHUI2RQ41fiVERAqZTAKCJVPUJmEd1PfFKaZtvf/AB23DcVQCfZLva 0Bvu3nY+aZOHwv2Hab6rJHA= =Dkjw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1348338.gGPtbXpQNA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list