public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] whitelisting the env ebuilds execute in
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:40:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050313154016.GC19847@freedom.wit.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1360 bytes --]

Subject pretty much says it all.  Currently *everything* from the users env winds up being available to ebuilds.
This complicates the hell out of my job of maintaining env handling (saving, transfering, reloading) in portage-cvs- 
having literally hundreds of env vars defined prior to even adding in the ebuild/eclass/portage env additions.

So... yeah.  Anyone got a good reason why all vars should be dumped into the ebuild environment?  I don't see the 
point in all of my binpkgs having my ECHANGELOG_USER setting, for example.

Assuming no one can come up with a valid reason why the entire user env must be dumped into the compilation 
environment, whitelisting of vars that are allowed in would be the next step.  LINGUAS, EXTRA_ECONF, etc.

Portage cvs already does it's own filtering of the vars it knows don't belong in the env- portage innard vars for 
example, are explicitly removed from any saved env.  The reason behind this is that portage wants to control those 
vars itself, basically striving for a controlled environment for ebuild execution (whether setup phase or compile).

I don't see why the same control shouldn't be extended to the portions of a users env that get pulled in.  
Ultimately, a user can sidestep it also via profile and portage bashrcs (so it's not a total lockdown on the env).

Thoughts?
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2005-03-13 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-13 15:40 Brian Harring [this message]
2005-03-13 15:48 ` [gentoo-dev] whitelisting the env ebuilds execute in Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-13 16:04   ` Brian Harring
2005-03-13 22:20     ` Ned Ludd
2005-03-13 23:05       ` Brian Harring
2005-03-13 23:24         ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2005-03-15  9:03       ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-03-14 19:21 ` Aron Griffis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050313154016.GC19847@freedom.wit.com \
    --to=ferringb@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox