public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:34:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050310043425.GF10754@dst.grantgoodyear.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422F7F4B.4090406@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1236 bytes --]

Alin Nastac wrote: [Wed Mar 09 2005, 04:57:15PM CST]
> Btw, what is the sense of ~arch if not "testing"? No gentooer 
> expects from a ~arch ebuild to be stable, so the sky would not fall if 
> you made a mistake and release it under this keyword. When I hear "I 
> cannot mark foo library as ~arch because I don't know how to test it" 
> smells like excuse to me.

*Sigh*  The meaning of ~arch is that, at a minimum, the package works
for the person who keyworded it (or, in some cases, worked for a trusted
user on whose behalf the package was keyworded).   In other words, the
dev believes that the package works, and that belief is based on
evidence, not just wishful thinking.  An "arch" keyword means that there
is considerable evidence that the package works for multiple people.
Packages that might work, but also might not, ideally should not be in
the tree at all, but could reasonably be package.mask'ed if testing is
imminent.

I'm pretty sure that I'm spouting the company line, here, but feel free
to correct me if I'm wrong.

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-09  1:55 [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy Jason Wever
2005-03-09  2:00 ` Hasan Khalil
2005-03-09  7:38 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 13:39   ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-09 14:50     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 16:22       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-09 17:38         ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 18:38           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-09 18:56             ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 19:10               ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 19:10                 ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 21:30                 ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-03-09 22:57                 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 23:27                   ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-10  0:50                     ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-10  0:18                       ` Daniel Goller
2005-03-09 23:36                   ` Jason Wever
2005-03-09 23:42                   ` Aron Griffis
2005-03-10  7:54                     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10  8:27                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-10 15:54                         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 15:52                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10  4:34                   ` Grant Goodyear [this message]
2005-03-10  8:36                     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10 13:14                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-10 16:00                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 19:00                         ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10 19:33                           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 21:25                             ` John Myers
2005-03-10 15:38                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-09 19:18               ` Patrick Lauer
2005-03-09 19:43                 ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 19:56                   ` Patrick Lauer
2005-03-10  0:55               ` Jon Portnoy
2005-03-10  8:07                 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 19:20             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-09 16:37       ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-09 16:43   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-09 17:40     ` Alin Nastac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050310043425.GF10754@dst.grantgoodyear.org \
    --to=g2boojum@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox