From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j29CuVML009992 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:56:31 GMT Received: from griffon26.demon.nl ([82.161.57.89] helo=griffon26.kfk4ever.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D90jl-00017H-UX for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:56:30 +0000 Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 30B1BA0027A; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:54:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:54:12 +0100 From: Maurice van der Pot To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives Message-ID: <20050309125412.GE23754@kfk4ever.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20050306162849.247c8c8f@snowdrop> <422DF989.3090206@hub.net.nz> <1110311465.9520.247.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050308224314.388e3793@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050308224314.388e3793@snowdrop> X-PGP-Key: http://www.kfk4ever.com/~griffon26/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.kfk4ever.com/ X-Archives-Salt: 33c751b8-7191-4c01-ab7e-28932423b8b6 X-Archives-Hash: daf6b7aa54103d4cd83173679b9c102c --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:43:14PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:51:04 -0500 Chris Gianelloni > wrote: > | On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:14 +1300, Jerome Brown wrote: > | > How about another option? > | >=20 > | > 6) Disallow -USE within groups, but allow -@GROUP > |=20 > | I like this option. >=20 > Ok, yeah, I'll buy that as a definite possibility. As I said earlier: > We are talking about negatives within groups, right?=20 Was my assumption incorrect? Maurice. P.S.: Ciaran, have you had enough caffeine yet for another look=20 at your GLEP? I think there's an error in the example in the section=20 named "Using Groups": the expansion of @GROUP2 in the third line from the bottom. --=20 Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCLvH0MGnpIbeahxwRAkYhAKCt4EIk1z9t4qVNT2DY/ws1qEzUkQCgx7x/ jm4aA08XNwasjJ0ufaGr9ig= =P1+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list