From: Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050307192415.GA23754@kfk4ever.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050306162849.247c8c8f@snowdrop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1869 bytes --]
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 04:28:49PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0029.html
>
> We need to decide upon a solution to the -flags problem. The proposed
> solutions are:
>
> 1) Disallow all negatives. Disadvantages: we don't tend to disallow
> things just because users could shoot themselves in the foot with them.
>
> 2) Allow negatives, and document how to use them correctly.
> Disadvantages: sooner or later, some developer isn't going to read the
> docs, and will really really screw things up with a misunderstanding.
>
...
>
> 5) Use some weird tristate notation. Disadvantages: not everyone has the
> slightest clue what set theory is.
'some weird tristate notation' must be what I proposed previously. =)
I'm still convinced that the use of it would be easy, both for
developers and for users, but I do acknowledge some (minor) issues like
finding another usable character for the new notation.
The last time I tried to explain my proposal, everybody except myself
seemed to think it was complicated, so I will not try to promote it
anymore, it's in the archives already.
> I'm in favour of 2) personally, but others disagree. I'd like a proper
> discussion on this before trying to get the GLEP through.
What I am still missing is a good argument _FOR_ negatives. We are
talking about negatives within groups, right? I agree with you that if
we choose 2, sooner or later it's going to get screwed up. We must have
a better reason for allowing them than just the off chance that negatives
might be useful in a way we cannot forsee yet.
If there is such a reason, I'd also pick 2.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-07 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 16:28 [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-07 19:24 ` Maurice van der Pot [this message]
2005-03-08 15:21 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-08 17:35 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-03-08 22:41 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-08 23:17 ` Olivier Crête
2005-03-08 23:26 ` Jason Wever
2005-03-08 2:29 ` Philip Webb
2005-03-08 19:14 ` Jerome Brown
2005-03-08 19:51 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-08 20:43 ` Jerome Brown
2005-03-08 22:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-09 12:54 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-03-09 16:21 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-08 23:48 ` Luca Barbato
2005-03-09 1:18 ` Marius Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050307192415.GA23754@kfk4ever.com \
--to=griffon26@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox