From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from parrot.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [156.56.111.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j24FetKj018344 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:40:56 GMT Received: (qmail 31007 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2005 15:40:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 2377 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 15:40:55 +0000 Received: from ns1.hostitnow.com (HELO sls-ce5p311.hostitnow.com) (209.152.181.224) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 15:40:55 +0000 Received: from c-67-181-38-200.client.comcast.net ([67.181.38.200] helo=192.168.0.106) by sls-ce5p311.hostitnow.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.44) id 1D7Ev9-0004ys-4e; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:40:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Parsing emerge From: Chris White To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <422841C8.10407@gentoo.org> References: <1109924970.11103.19.camel@secures> <422841C8.10407@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ofOpNzYoOK/Or0aIWCl6" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 00:05:39 +0900 Message-ID: <1109948743.11103.33.camel@secures> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sls-ce5p311.hostitnow.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gentoo.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 57cde9e5-34ef-48f9-9f51-564c4a984ee5 X-Archives-Hash: 8bba58de3e57f55f6477abb99c01f59c Message-ID: <20050304150539.ro-bdiGHk-ZIE2V9ek2-C5bj3IWBzWCqsSdziSeJ9HI@z> --=-ofOpNzYoOK/Or0aIWCl6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2005-03-04 11:08 +0000 Ian Leitch Wrote: > Sorry to spoil your post Chris, but I think this is just another > testimonial to how badly we all need that portage API (plus the portage > daemon for tools such as Porthole who currently also have to parse > emerge output). This is by no means the first attempt at parsing I've see= n. Well, I do indeed see that as a valid argument, but at the same time, something like this may take a bit shorter time as far as implementation than getting the works of a new portage API. In fact, even if we did get a portage API, I still think that parsing could extend the flexibility of portage as you have you seen. On another point, I would assume (correct me if I'm wrong), that the portage API would be python based. For those who don't want to use python, you can still add functionality (this was written in perl) that you desire. > But hey, nice work in the absence of the API, it does look like the > script has uses. >=20 > Regards, > Ian Leitch --=-ofOpNzYoOK/Or0aIWCl6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=E3=81=93=E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3=83=83=E3=82=BB=E3=83=BC?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E3=82=B8=E3=81=AB=E3=81=AF=E3=83=87=E3=82=B8=E3=82=BF?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E3=83=AB=E7=BD=B2=E5=90=8D=E3=81=95=E3=82=8C=E3=81=9F?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=83=A8=E5=88=86=E3=81=8C=E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=BE?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E3=81=99?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCKHlDFdQwWVoAgN4RApoqAKDjdKf/UvwpADIm505nc5+ZhOnyUQCeM8Qx HnegJQxFONkvq19dW5+9BqI= =ErUY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ofOpNzYoOK/Or0aIWCl6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list