From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j21CNlIn027514 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:23:47 GMT Received: from 142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp ([219.111.13.142] helo=tiger.gg3.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D66Pe-0007zO-Rw for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:23:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 26363 invoked by uid 89); 1 Mar 2005 21:23:44 +0900 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 21:23:44 +0900 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:23:44 +0900 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:23:44 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Small irritation: Can people please stop sending their posts in duplicate... Message-ID: <20050301122344.GA1627313@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <42231CC4.5010000@longlandclan.hopto.org> <422412C0.8050604@cox.net> <422420E5.5070504@longlandclan.hopto.org> <200503010020.32684.anthony@ectrolinux.com> <42243B6D.8000604@longlandclan.hopto.org> <20050301121715.GB1627152@lion.gg3.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050301121715.GB1627152@lion.gg3.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Archives-Salt: 9248a01b-a5ae-4719-8686-4161141c187b X-Archives-Hash: c575de3931ec7b11945760f5698bbe0e --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable maillog: 01/03/2005-21:17:15(+0900): =E7=C5=CF=D2=C7=C9 =E7=C5=CF=D2=C7=C9= =C5=D7 types > maillog: 01/03/2005-19:52:45(+1000): Stuart Longland types > > Anthony Gorecki wrote: > > >On Monday, February 28, 2005 11:59 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: > > > > > >>...and some email clients (KMail comes to mind) are even able to > > >>directly use this information. > > > > > >Do we have any Mutt users that can comment on support for this? > >=20 > > Something tells me this is another one that supports this -- but I'm not > > sure. >=20 > No it doesn't. Either that, or my muttrc if screwed. No it doesn't. Either that, or my muttrc IS screwed. --=20 ) Georgi Georgiev ) QOTD: "I used to get high on life but ) ( chutz@gg3.net ( lately I've built up a resistance." ( ) +81(90)6266-1163 ) ) --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCJF7QfXO2NUT1EmYRAu+ZAJ4l8oPS3DyE1Av/7Q5PudZ+V7Y1FgCgtYZt DxlpHCy45T116e+J25XS+20= =d2Ev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list