From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1RNWVuL030502 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:32:31 GMT Received: from 142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp ([219.111.13.142] helo=tiger.gg3.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D5Xtl-0006Dt-4d for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:32:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 19164 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2005 08:32:29 +0900 Received: from ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp (HELO ols-dell.cc.hokudai.ac.jp) (133.87.4.159) by 0 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 08:32:29 +0900 Received: by ols-dell.cc.hokudai.ac.jp (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:32:28 +0900 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:32:28 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Message-ID: <20050227233228.GB4624@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20050226204457.0bfad52d@snowdrop> <1109544099.17805.4.camel@pursuit> <20050227230307.61785de8@snowdrop> <20050226204457.0bfad52d@snowdrop> <20050227212828.37717.qmail@web50407.mail.yahoo.com> <20050227215917.GB17631@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227230307.61785de8@snowdrop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 4317fe47-00f2-4208-b543-5007d837957a X-Archives-Hash: b7da4a524ba0605f58dbe8beb89d44f0 maillog: 27/02/2005-23:03:07(+0000): Ciaran McCreesh types > It's really quite simple. Thanks to devrel's habit of making nasty > threats to any developer who upsets a user, it's now necessary to post a > message like this indicating that the issue was discussed before > implementation. A sensible post might imply that I find these kinds of > restrictions acceptable, and that I'm happy to sit around and watch the > distribution be ruined by debian-style bureaucracy (anyone else see the > hotbabe mess?). maillog: 27/02/2005-18:11:58(-0500): Lina Pezzella types > This thread brings up a very good point. There are little children > using our distribution, and they should not be exposed to dirty words > such as the one being disputed in this thread. There are other packages > that are also questionable too. "BitchX" comes to mind, and "Evolution" > is on the top of my die-package-die list. We certainly wouldn't want > little children asking about that, now would we? > > In light of the above, I suggest that in the interest of being sure not > to offend anyone, we remove the three aforementioned packages and any > others that might be offensive. It's not censorship, it's decency. It's time to add a "offendme" FEATURE similar to the "offensive" USE flag. Unsetting the FEATURE should add --exclude '*fuck*' --exclude '*bitch*' --exclude '*evoluion*', etc. to the rsync command line. Boy, I'd love to see that implemented :)) Also add dev-libs/hashit to the list. The last 4 letters are way too offensive. Anyone up for the GLEP? -- / Georgi Georgiev / I want to read my new poem about pork / \ chutz@gg3.net \ brains and outer space ... \ / +81(90)6266-1163 / / -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list