From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1RM5QKg031876
	for <gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:05:26 GMT
Received: from web50409.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.244])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with smtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1D5WXU-0005wX-3u
	for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:05:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 55880 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 22:05:24 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=zGMHKnWF1ONWDwDYqlDOWCCut17woridi4eKOtuUMoP9utnMug3mBDWe4S9I6BZdwK1As/eSycdwM/u4UrjMYjTNkCWMlNjXd7b+5v01TOIkfQsteBzuhFeSPT6AxAgZ215sWCMFp7KgdPqkMMFEI7jc482FbWgcATykcsCBVHA=  ;
Message-ID: <20050227220524.55878.qmail@web50409.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [67.1.44.54] by web50409.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:05:24 PST
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:05:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Jason S <kutsuya1@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude?
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <422240D6.3070600@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Archives-Salt: c84961bd-2418-4387-944d-e1ea07aba546
X-Archives-Hash: d9aa8024369c491c8ea5c0f1da88f430


--- "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Jason S wrote:
> > --- Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:28:28 -0800 (PST) Jason S
> >><kutsuya1@yahoo.com>

[...]

> > 
> > What do you mean by 'better', and what are you
> > suggesting?
> > 
> 
> I think he is suggesting you use some common sense
> instead of resorting 
> to a knee jerk reaction.
> 
> Steve

Using your 'common sense' how does this fit into the
'clean language' policy?  From my point of view if
that package name is allowed then the policy is
unenforcable.

It's not a knee jerk reaction. I saw this problem
coming way back. I have dealt with it before, and have
no reason to change.

I've already given devrel a heads-up about this today.

Regards,

kutsuya (aka bit`)


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list