From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1S25gXJ025553 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:05:42 GMT Received: from s010602608cdb4440.vn.shawcable.net ([24.87.161.251] helo=ectrolinux.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D5aHz-0006nh-Ba for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:05:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 17350 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2005 18:03:06 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO entro.nv.ectrolinux.com) (anthony@ectrolinux.com@172.16.1.3) by 0 with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 27 Feb 2005 18:03:00 -0800 From: Anthony Gorecki To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:02:57 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.92 References: <200502260502.12277.anthony@ectrolinux.com> <20050227123547.GA14936@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20050227171341.64708a0b@snowdrop> In-Reply-To: <20050227171341.64708a0b@snowdrop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4073678.M9JM9aNPBS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502271803.01417.anthony@ectrolinux.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-gr1 (2004-11-16) on selene.nv.ectrolinux.com X-Spam-Status: No; -5.8 hits out of a required 6.0 X-Spam-Report: * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Archives-Salt: cb8cc28f-93e7-4a71-844c-aa54880087a8 X-Archives-Hash: 5a305f47b3b7dd584b079a897e6ae06e --nextPart4073678.M9JM9aNPBS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, February 27, 2005 9:13 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > How about we recognise that individual ebuilds aren't worth anything > and that the tree *as a whole* should be copyrighted as a single work? This seems like a sensible idea, presuming the developers make certain that= =20 the ebuilds which are committed to the tree are licensed under the GPL. I d= o,=20 however, believe that the original author of a newly contributed ebuild=20 deserves at least to have his name mentioned as such in the file. =2D-=20 Anthony Gorecki Ectro-Linux Foundation --nextPart4073678.M9JM9aNPBS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQiJ71b8NHCarD3E0AQIAHA/+KWT2BCb24lhCiwCJMZNYc6o+2P2QN7pM zBUiT8Yg5h2r7enDe7YbgBHz2ayLzYEU+OhqyafarC/LaZZnl08psDTibQewFUEJ OI4tjAfomPEyM2z+NJ4crXPkmETat1L046xnXDdSgYdmMkCgiMEgK5w1P5o1gXl3 Y8nCIh9fmA9LoMoTraTHCegP2vF0PobCFAjPjUzAW2ola8N/zWZrHDtifAgN/TeP aJygiszQ6aHFCSIHiN4ozZxEXUNc7EMiSqYW9+6kjqiFZQOiJKmkFaT1kOgbwZh0 HV3lJFnJdM21QxGQuCHywd8cKGApJeAWicpeotMrzJntqqaspGd9r2apErEe8++a BsvUEcbMaCvHE5pBiv/PzNJeCwkL+/DgHsnYUNk9MDCA8x7y+xskwI6jrWdg2K2w iFeGXsEFL9quSCVEAcoy/J8dCJ/K98vs/FGRfNR0wiz3ybgkgvasS/fefpBZsgxX Ec0Hp4wyyteC+SDOPI8IA5+j9u0h0a+DuFTVDoq/SCxbOMnpbAMJihO1Rphe1P0T 7jg/XiXr3AH6AlEFoc0f/Z1ReuNVGORmMwTOxPi9msJPTdHBHXjHutBGLvQuXeYk qu8FJ21esi8KxP8ornk7YlxB8Bv0TfFiO+lvTxHtKLJPe+usYHMKnq1MJ0SGL3Ty yUJ9zpADBYg= =yDMG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4073678.M9JM9aNPBS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list