From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:35:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502231435.44051.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109186589.17471.37.camel@nosferatu.lan>
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 02:23 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs?
>
> If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as
> raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already.
i like having sys-fs / sys-hardware ... having sys-storage just kind of blurs
the lines ...
> > sys-network: or move stuff to net-*?
>
> You might consider them more critical to get the system up, so more
> system related?
nah, most of those packages arent even on a typical machine unless the user
emerges em :) ... i'd vote for disseminating them into other sys- or net-
categories
netboot-base should go along side baselayout since they serve [pretty much]
the same function
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-23 19:00 [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-23 19:07 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-02-23 19:23 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-02-23 19:35 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2005-02-23 22:31 ` tchiwam
2005-02-23 22:51 ` Jim Northrup
2005-02-23 22:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-02-23 22:51 ` Greg KH
2005-02-23 21:43 ` Olivier Crête
2005-02-27 20:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 22:09 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-01 1:21 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 1:34 ` Olivier Crête
2005-03-01 1:41 ` [gentoo-dev] x86 vs amd64 :: ppc vs ppc64 (was sys-apps is too big) Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 1:49 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-01 2:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-04 2:32 ` Kumba
2005-03-04 2:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 8:20 ` [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 9:50 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-01 10:40 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 11:54 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-03-01 12:11 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 14:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-03-01 14:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 14:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-03-01 15:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 23:21 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-01 23:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 23:40 ` Robin H. Johnson
2005-03-01 23:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-01 23:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 11:12 ` Aaron Walker
2005-03-01 18:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-03 20:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502231435.44051.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox