From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17833 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 14:40:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Nov 2004 14:40:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CXKn6-0002eS-4I for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:40:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 31394 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2004 14:40:11 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29497 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 14:40:11 +0000 From: HeinrichWendel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:39:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41A5DF33.4030407@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <41A5DF33.4030407@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Foundation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411251539.58626.lanius@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] regarding app-rox (attempt n. 2) X-Archives-Salt: 8b0a7923-34f5-4531-afef-e7ef82fb2a88 X-Archives-Hash: f5c3fa180999edfdf7b072467a7c234e On Thursday 25 November 2004 14:33, Sergey Kuleshov wrote: > Hello All! > > I've already rose the question a few months ago, but then I haven't done > anything about it. And because, I am not sure, what the formal > procedures are now, I guess I'd be better off asking again :) > > So to the point. There is a bug #51996 with a few (around 20) ebuilds > for Rox Desktop. Author of those ebuilds told me, that more are coming > soon. I guess it makes sense to make a category app-rox for those, > rather than throw them to different categories. > > P.S. I have been really busy with university work lately, but now I'll > try to get back to active work for gentoo... I currently maintain rox-filer. App-rox seems fine for me as category, because there are not too much ebuilds for more than one category. > > Regards, mfg, heinrich -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list