From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17879 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CUpf9-0004MT-Nk for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 31316 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5437 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:01:25 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041118170125.21d7121c@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1100794911.16897.24.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <1100732466.23254.24.camel@helen.science.oregonstate.edu> <1100787048.16897.21.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20041118153905.62099aa6@snowdrop.home> <1100794911.16897.24.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__18_Nov_2004_17_01_26_+0000_.etXnCqYv9Eoyifi" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4 needs testers X-Archives-Salt: d60cae74-ed56-4ca2-8960-cd3dfc181c28 X-Archives-Hash: c2634c4faf7075ef22b27ceaefabbd25 --Signature=_Thu__18_Nov_2004_17_01_26_+0000_.etXnCqYv9Eoyifi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:21:51 -0500 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:39 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Ick. I'd be inclined to not use minimal vim for livecds, it's | > *really* stripped down... What're the deps pulled in by non-minimal | > vim that you don't like? | | I honestly have not researched it very far other than to find that vim | (and vim-core) using USE="livecd minimal" came out with a LiveCD that | was nearly 10MB smaller (after squashfs). Considering the entire x86 | minimal LiveCD is 50MB, that is a very significant savings. Hm, I suspect it's the livecd USE flag on vim-core that's doing most of that... Built as: [ R ] =app-editors/vim-7.0_alpha20040924 -acl -cscope -debug -gpm -minimal -mzscheme +ncurses -nls -perl -python -ruby (-selinux) -tcltk -vim-with-x 0 kB [1] which includes proper terminal support, vim comes to about a meg on the system I'm on right now. With minimal turned on it comes to just over 400KBytes. vim-core built normally is about eleven megs across a thousand or so files, built with USE="livecd -nls" it's one meg and ~200 files (and I could probably nuke a hundred or so of those, if you don't mind upsetting people who want to use straaange keymaps). So, if half a meg (assuming you already have ncurses) isn't too high a price for decent terminal (terminfo rather than termcap) support, you might not necessarily be best with the minimal USE flag turned on (I'm guessing catalyst still doesn't do per-package USE flags easily?). [ Disclaimer: measured using my experimental vim7 ebuilds which won't be in the tree until at least 65216 and 66762 are closed, so don't even think about asking, mkay? vim6 should be fairly similar though... ] -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Thu__18_Nov_2004_17_01_26_+0000_.etXnCqYv9Eoyifi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBnNVo96zL6DUtXhERAvLKAKDnKpBKSTygbeRSHGYPCgYE1RDHrwCfZTIa zVLceXHS17FfCp93onBI7UE= =Z9h/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__18_Nov_2004_17_01_26_+0000_.etXnCqYv9Eoyifi--